Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O1A.1 Pesticide exposure of workers during treatment and re-entry tasks in apple-growing: results from the canepa study in france
Free
  1. Mathilde Bureau1,
  2. Béatrix Béziat1,
  3. Geoffroy Duporté2,
  4. Yannick Lecluse3,
  5. Xavier Schwall1,
  6. Valérie Bouchart3,4,
  7. Gaëlle Riou3,4,
  8. Emmanuelle Barron2,
  9. Marie-Hélène Devier2,
  10. Francis Macary5,
  11. Alain Garrigou1,
  12. Hélène Budzinski2,
  13. Pierre Lebailly3,
  14. Isabelle Baldi1
  1. 1Equipe EPICENE, Bordeaux Population Health Center, Inserm U1219, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
  2. 2Equipe LPTC, EPOC UMR 5805, Université de Bordeaux – CNRS, Bordeaux, France
  3. 3Equipe Anticipe, UMR 1086, Université de Caen-Normandie – Inserm, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
  4. 4Laboratoire LABEO, Caen, France
  5. 5Equipe EABX, UR ETBX, IRSTEA, Bordeaux – Cestas, France

Abstract

Few studies were performed to assess workers’ exposure to pesticides in orchards and even less during re-entry activities. However, nearly 40 pesticide treatments per year are carried out in apple-growing especially against fungal diseases, mainly scab. In order to characterize pesticide exposures of farmers in epidemiological studies, we performed a non-controlled field study in 3 regions of France (Normandy, South-West and Rhône-Alpes) in apple orchards during the 2016 and 2017 seasons. We observed the activity of the workers trying to disrupt it as little as possible. Workers’ external contamination and their determinants were assessed during 158 working days, corresponding to 31 treatment days (including mixing, spraying and equipment cleaning), 69 re-entry days (including apple hand-thinning, anti-hail net opening and closing tasks) and 58 harvesting days. We performed both detailed observations of work characteristics on the whole day (including an ergonomic approach) and pesticide measurements for dermal contamination during each task (following the OCDE guidelines). Potential dermal exposure was measured with cotton pads placed onto the skin (11 body areas), and cotton gloves or hand rinsing for each task. Captan and dithianon, fungicides representative of pesticide use in apple-growing, were used as markers for exposure. Relative contribution of the different body areas to total exposure was assessed. In addition, to investigate potential sources of contamination, we measured dislodgeable residues in the environment of the workers by analyzing leaf and fruit samples and surfaces of work equipment. Results indicated that workers’ dermal exposure was higher during re-entry tasks than treatments and harvests. The median dermal contamination during treatment was 4.03 mg of active ingredients per day, levels ranging from 0.95 mg to 64.19 mg. Most of the contamination was observed on the hands, especially during mixing. We will focus our presentation on levels and main determinants of pesticide exposure during treatment tasks.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.