Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Environmental exposures in young adults with declining kidney function in a population at risk of Mesoamerican nephropathy
  1. Evangelia-Theano Smpokou1,
  2. Marvin González-Quiroz1,2,
  3. Carla Martins3,4,
  4. Paula Alvito3,4,
  5. Jennifer Le Blond5,
  6. Jason Glaser6,7,
  7. Aurora Aragón2,
  8. Catharina Wesseling6,8,
  9. Dorothea Nitsch7,
  10. Neil Pearce7,9,
  11. Jill Norman1,
  12. Christian H Lindh10,
  13. Jackie Morton11,
  14. Ben Caplin1
  1. 1 Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2 Research Centre on Health, Work and Environment, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua at León (UNAN-León), León, Nicaragua
  3. 3 Department of Food and Nutrition, National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Lisboa, Portugal
  4. 4 Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
  5. 5 Royal School of Mines, Imperial College London, London, UK
  6. 6 Executive, La Isla Network, Ada, Michigan, USA
  7. 7 Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  8. 8 Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  9. 9 Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Centre for Global NCDs, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  10. 10 Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  11. 11 HSE Science and Research Centre, Health and Safety Executive, Buxton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Evangelia-Theano Smpokou, Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK; evangelia.smpokou.13{at}ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives There is an epidemic of Mesoamerican nephropathy (MeN) in Central America, where sugarcane production is prominent. Numerous causes are proposed, but to date limited evidence supports any one hypothesis. A nested case–control study using biosamples from a rural, community-based follow-up study of 350 young adults from Northwest Nicaragua at risk of MeN was conducted with the aim of characterising the associations between urinary concentrations of metals, pesticides and mycotoxins from samples collected in the first 6 months and decline in kidney function over 2 years.

Methods Urine samples collected at baseline (pre-sugarcane harvest) and the first 6 month follow-up (post-sugarcane harvest) visit were tested. Twelve metals and metalloids (aluminium, total arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, selenium, silicon and strontium) were analysed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Twelve pesticides or their metabolites (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 3-phenoxybenzoic acid, 4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid, chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propen-1-yl-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid, cis/trans 3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane carboxylic acid, ethylenethiourea, glyphosate, 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy acetic acid, 3-hydroxy-pyrimetanil, 5-hydroxytiabendazole, hydroxy-tebuconazole and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol) and two mycotoxins (ochratoxin A (OTA) and citrinin (CIT)) were analysed by liquid chromatography coupled-mass spectrometry. Differences in the creatinine-corrected urinary concentrations of the measured exposures between outcome groups (participants with stable vs declining kidney function) were examined.

Results Elevated levels of aluminium and total arsenic as well as metabolites of several pesticides were detected across the population. No differences were identified between the declining and stable groups in the levels of metals or pesticides tested. OTA and CIT were below the limit of detection.

Conclusions The tested metals, metalloids, pesticides and mycotoxins were not associated with loss of kidney function in participants at-risk of MeN.

  • chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu)
  • nephrotoxicity
  • pesticides
  • mesoamerican nephropathy (MeN)
  • environmental toxins
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors ETS, BC, MGQ, JN, JM, DN and NP conceived and designed the studies. ETS analysed the data. ETS, MGQ, BC, JM, CM, CHL and PA contributed to data collection. All authors were involved in writing the paper and approved the submitted version.

  • Funding This study was supported by the Colt Foundation (Grant number CF/03/14 and through a PhD fellowship awarded to ETS). Additional support was received from the Dutch National Postcode Lottery providing additional funding through Solidaridad. Thanks are due for the financial support to CESAM (UID/AMB/50017/2019), to FCT/MEC through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval All participants provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the bioethical review board at the Medical Faculty of UNAN-León (Ref: FWA00004523/IRB00003342), and the research ethics committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref: 8643) in 2014.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.