Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Letter
Response to: ‘Psychosocial job stressors and suicidality: a meta-analysis and systematic review’ by Milner et al
  1. BongKyoo Choi1,2,3
  1. 1 Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
  2. 2 Environmental Health Sciences Graduate Program, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
  3. 3 Program in Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Professor BongKyoo Choi, Department of Medicine, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA; b.choi{at}uci.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

I read with great interest the meta-analysis paper by Milner et al 1 about the associations between psychosocial job stressors and suicidality in working populations. The authors have compiled  and investigated 22 epidemiological studies on chronic job stressors (job control, job demands, job strain, colleague/supervisor support, effortreward imbalance, job insecurity, role conflict and working hours/shift work) and suicide ideation/death in the literature, which is a very timely and important review that will contribute to the primary prevention of suicide in working populations.

However, I would like to point out one important data extraction error in their paper. The authors1 reported that high psychological job demands increased the risk for suicide death in the original paper by Ostry et al 2: OR=1.32 (95% CI: 1.31 to 1.33). They also reported a gender difference in their meta-analysis that high psychological job demands were significantly and positively associated with suicide death in male workers (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.31). However, as a matter of fact, in the original paper by Ostry et al 2 the direction of the association was the opposite: that is, high psychological job demands ‘decreased’ the risk for suicide death in Canadian male sawmill workers: OR=0.76 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.85). It is very likely that the authors’ finding of a positive association between high psychological job demands and suicide death in male workers in the paper1 resulted from the data extraction error.

Ironically, the aforementioned data extraction error by the authors leads us into an important knowledge gap in the literature between cross-sectional and longitudinal studies with regard to the association between high psychological job demands and suicidality. Most cross-sectional studies included in the paper by Milner et al 1 supported a positive association between high psychological job demands and suicide ideation. However, in previous two longitudinal studies in Canada and Japan,2 3 high psychological job demands were negatively associated with suicide death. Given that suicide ideation increases the risk for suicide attempt or death,4 it’s reasonable to expect a positive association between high psychological job demands and suicide death in longitudinal studies. But there is no longitudinal study supporting the expected positive association in the literature. More longitudinal studies are warranted in future for the association between high psychological job demands and suicide death.

References

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles