Article Text
PDFPostScript
Letter
Concerning the plausibility of the findings reported in ’Prenatal exposure to glycol ethers and cryptorchidism and hypospadias: a nested case–control study' by Smet and Kelsey: authors' response
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors CW, LM and RG prepared and wrote this reply letter.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval CNIL, CCTIRS.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it first published online. References to ’Kelsey et al' have been changed to ’Smet and Kelsey' (as per reference 1).
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.