Article Text

Download PDFPDF
0434 A meta-analysis of occupational silica exposure and risk of autoimmune rheumatic diseases: does study quality matter?
  1. Henrik A Kolstad1,
  2. Christiane Beer2,
  3. David Sherson3,
  4. Anne Troldborg4,
  5. Berit Dalsgaard Nielsen4,
  6. Anne Braae Olesen5,
  7. Gitte Jacobsen6,
  8. Søndergaard Klaus4,
  9. Schlünssen Vivi2,7
  1. 1Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Public Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  4. 4Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  5. 5Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  6. 6Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Hospital Region Vest, Herning, Denmark
  7. 7National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark


Objectives Increased risks of rheumatoid arthritis, small vessel vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis have been observed following crystalline silica exposure. Our aims are to estimate pooled risk estimates and assess the impact of study quality.

Methods We followed the PRISMA criteria, identified 1162 articles, and included 21 studies that we classified according to eight quality parameters (high vs. low). We estimated pooled overall and disease specific odds ratios (ORs) with random effects meta-regressions.

Results We observed an increased overall OR of 2.3 (1.7–3.1, 21 studies) and for rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.8–3.41, 6 studies), small vessel vasculitis (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2–4.7, 6 studies), systemic lupus erythematosus (OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.5–14.7, 3 studies), and systemic sclerosis (OR) 2.9, 1.7–4.9, 6 studies). The following high-quality characteristics were associated with decreased ORs: appropriate control group, high response rate, appropriate confounder control, independent exposure information, and many participants; and with increased ORs: quantitative or semi-quantitative exposure measure, hospital based diagnosis, and well-defined diagnostic criteria. Only the latter was statistically significant (p<0.05). When we consecutively excluded low quality studies, the overall OR value decreased to 1.3 (0.4–4.2, 3 studies) but this exercise was sensitive to the order. Egger’s test of no small study effect was highly statistically significant (p<0.01).

Conclusion This review provides some evidence that crystalline silica is associated with systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and small vessel vasculitis. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm or refute if this represents causal associations.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.