Article Text

Download PDFPDF
S02-5 The relationship between median nerve latency, pain and work disability from carpal tunnel syndrome
  1. Carisa Harris Adamson1,2,
  2. Ellen Eisen2,
  3. Jay Kapellusch3,
  4. Arun Garg3,
  5. Kurt Hegmann4,
  6. Matthew Thiese4,
  7. Bradely Evanoff5,
  8. Ann Marie Dale5,
  9. Stephen Bao6,
  10. Barbara Silverstein6,
  11. Fred Gerr7,
  12. David Rempel1,2
  1. 1University of California, San Francisco, USA
  2. 2University of California, Berkeley, USA
  3. 3University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
  4. 4University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
  5. 5Washington University, St Louis, USA
  6. 6Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention, Olympia, USA
  7. 7University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA


Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is an important occupational health problem because its frequency and severity lead to more disability than most other upper extremity disorders and is an important driver of overall workers compensation costs (US Bureau of Labour & Statistics 2010; Foley 2007). Identifying individuals at risk for increased severity is an important aspect of secondary prevention programs. This analysis examined the relationship between median nerve latency, pain and work disability from CTS in a pooled prospective cohort.

Methods 4321 workers were evaluated and followed up to 7 years with repeated symptom surveys and nerve conduction studies to identify prevalent and incident cases of CTS (N = 318). CTS case criteria included symptoms in a median nerve distribution of the digits (1–3) and an abnormal electrodiagnostic study. Among those with CTS, work disability was defined as symptom driven: (1) change in work pace/quality, (2) lost time, or (3) job change, derived from SF12 and quickDASH questionnaires. Adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results Of the 318 workers with prevalent or incident CTS, 57.5%(N = 183) reported a work disability. The most common disability was a change in work pace/quality (n = 124), followed by job change (n = 71), and lost-time(n = 56). Median sensory latency (HRupper = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.06–3.16) and pain(HRupper = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.03–2.62) were associated with increased changes in work pace/quality but were not associated with lost time or job change due to hand symptoms. Median motor latency at the time of diagnosis was not associated with any measures of CTS related work disability.

Discussion These results indicate that median sensory latency and hand/wrist pain were associated with increased change in work pace/quality from CTS, but were not associated with other more severe measures of work disability such as lost time or job change.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.