Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Early prognosis of noise-induced hearing loss: prioritising prevention over prediction
  1. Christa L Themann,
  2. David C Byrne,
  3. Rickie R Davis,
  4. Thais C Morata,
  5. William J Murphy,
  6. Mark R Stephenson
  1. Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  1. Correspondence to Christa L Themann, Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-27, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA; CLT6{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Moshammer et al1 have recommended routine implementation of a temporary threshold shift (TTS) screening test to identify workers particularly at risk of developing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) from occupational exposure to hazardous noise. Their work addresses an important occupational health problem. NIHL ranks among the most common work-related injuries in many countries, with an estimated global annual incidence of 1.6 million cases, and accounts for approximately 16% of disabling adult hearing losses worldwide.2 ,3 Individuals vary in their susceptibility to the damaging effects of noise and no suitable method currently exists to predict the susceptibility of a particular worker.

In their study, Moshammer et al measured TTS in newly hired employees following exposure to a 20 min, high-intensity, low-frequency experimental noise. They then followed the workers over time to see who ultimately developed a permanent threshold shift (PTS). The authors report that a TTS of 14 dB or more measured 2.5 min after the experimental exposure identifies workers at greater risk for PTS. They recommend routinely using this procedure to screen for susceptibility to noise in workplace hearing loss prevention programmes.

However, this recommendation is premature in view of the study results. The TTS measure had a sensitivity of 82%, meaning that 18% of those who developed PTS were not identified by the TTS screening—a …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Disclaimer The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites. All Web addresses referenced in this document were accessible as of the publication date.

Linked Articles

  • Workplace
    Hanns Moshammer Michael Kundi Peter Wallner Alois Herbst Anton Feuerstein Hans-Peter Hutter