332 Duration as a proxy for cumulative exposure: Should we trust positive results? | Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Article info

Session: 20. Risk modelling

332 Duration as a proxy for cumulative exposure: Should we trust positive results?

Free

Authors

F Barone Adesi 1National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States of America PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Burstyn 2Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States of America PubMed articles Google scholar articles

Citation

Barone Adesi F, Burstyn

332 Duration as a proxy for cumulative exposure: Should we trust positive results?

Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2013;70:A113.

Publication history

First published October 11, 2013.

Online issue publication

April 27, 2016

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions