Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Occupational asthma caused by the predatory beneficial mites Amblyseius californicus and Amblyseius cucumeris
  1. SG Skousgaard1,
  2. T Thisling1,
  3. C Bindslev-Jensen2,
  4. J Baelum1
  1. 1Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Allergology and Dermatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Søren Glud Skousgaard, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; soeren.skousgaard{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The increasing awareness of problems with chemical pesticides used in greenhouses has led to a widespread use of biological control measures such as beneficial arthropods and microbiological pesticides. However, exposure to microbiological pesticides may confer a risk of immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitization.1 In a study by Baelum et al including 456 greenhouse workers, skin rash, nose and eye symptoms were seen in persons developing sensitization towards beneficial predatory mites during the 3-year study period and Groenewoud et al found a prevalence of 23% of sensitization to Amblyseius cucumeris in a cross-sectional study of 472 Dutch greenhouse workers.2 3 The predatory beneficial mites A cucumeris and Amblyseius californicus is known to cause sensitization and allergic symptoms from the skin, nose and eyes, but so far no case of occupational asthma caused by these predatory mites has been reported.

A 34-year-old male gardener, a non-smoker, was referred to our Department of Occupational and Environmental Health. The previous 10 years, he had been working in a tomato and green pepper nursery. During …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.