Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Predicting chemicals causing cancer in animals as human carcinogens
  1. James Huff
  1. Correspondence to National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; huff1{at}niehs.nih.gov

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Further to the posit by Suarthana et al (Occup Environ Med 2009;66:713–14) for predicting occupational diseases, long-term carcinogenesis bioassays using experimental animals are the most predictive method for identifying likely human carcinogens. Since the 1960s, bioassays have proven a mainstay for identifying chemical carcinogens, establishing occupational exposure standards, and primary cancer prevention. The reasons, rationale, and validity are many. Most importantly, long-term bioassays are both predictive (prospective) and confirmatory (retrospective) for human carcinogens.

Historically there has long been an agreeable association between carcinogenic outcomes from bioassays and human cancer hazards.1 2 These correlations stem from accumulated evidence over the last 50 years during the modern era of experimental carcinogenesis. …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Other Funders: NIH.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.