Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Determinants of implementation of primary preventive interventions on patient handling in healthcare: a systematic review
  1. E Koppelaar1,2,
  2. J J Knibbe3,
  3. H S Miedema2,4,
  4. A Burdorf1
  1. 1
    Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Netherlands Expert Center for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3
    LOCOmotion, Bennekom, The Netherlands
  4. 4
    Expert Center Participation, Work and Health, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands
  1. A Burdorf, Erasmus MC, Department of Public Health, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; a.burdorf{at}erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aims (1) to identify barriers and facilitators during implementation of primary preventive interventions on patient handling in healthcare, and (2) to assess their influence on the effectiveness of these interventions.

Methods: PubMed and Web of Science were searched from January 1988 to July 2007. Study inclusion criteria included evaluation of a primary preventive intervention on patient handling, quantitative assessment of the effect of the intervention on physical load or musculoskeletal disorders or sick leave, and information on barriers or facilitators in the implementation of the intervention. 19 studies were included, comprising engineering (n = 10), personal (n = 6) and multiple interventions (n = 3). Barriers and facilitators were classified into individual and environmental categories of factors that hampered or enhanced the appropriate implementation of the intervention.

Results: 16 individual and 45 environmental barriers and facilitators were identified. The most important environmental categories were “convenience and easy accessibility” (56%), “supportive management climate” (18%) and “patient-related factors” (11%). An important individual category was motivation (63%). None of the studies quantified their impact on effectiveness nor on compliance and adherence to the intervention.

Conclusion: Various factors may influence the appropriate implementation of primary preventive interventions, but their impact on the effectiveness of the interventions was not evaluated. Since barriers in implementation are often acknowledged as the cause of the ineffectiveness of patient handling devices, there is a clear need to quantify the influence of these barriers on the effectiveness of primary preventive interventions in healthcare.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was funded by a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw - grant number 63200014).

  • Competing interests: None.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.