You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original article
The relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the southern California wildfires of 2003
  1. R J Delfino1,
  2. S Brummel2,
  3. J Wu1,3,
  4. H Stern2,
  5. B Ostro4,
  6. M Lipsett5,
  7. A Winer6,
  8. D H Street7,
  9. L Zhang5,
  10. T Tjoa1,
  11. D L Gillen2
  1. 1
    Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
  2. 2
    Department of Statistics, School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
  3. 3
    Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
  4. 4
    Air Pollution Epidemiology Section, California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, California, USA
  5. 5
    Exposure Assessment Section, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, California Department of Health Services, Oakland, California, USA
  6. 6
    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  7. 7
    Independent consultant, Salem, Oregon, USA
  1. Dr Ralph J Delfino, Epidemiology Department, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, 100 Theory Dr., Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92617-7555, USA; rdelfino{at}uci.edu

Abstract

Objective: There is limited information on the public health impact of wildfires. The relationship of cardiorespiratory hospital admissions (n = 40 856) to wildfire-related particulate matter (PM2.5) during catastrophic wildfires in southern California in October 2003 was evaluated.

Methods: Zip code level PM2.5 concentrations were estimated using spatial interpolations from measured PM2.5, light extinction, meteorological conditions, and smoke information from MODIS satellite images at 250 m resolution. Generalised estimating equations for Poisson data were used to assess the relationship between daily admissions and PM2.5, adjusted for weather, fungal spores (associated with asthma), weekend, zip code-level population and sociodemographics.

Results: Associations of 2-day average PM2.5 with respiratory admissions were stronger during than before or after the fires. Average increases of 70 μg/m3 PM2.5 during heavy smoke conditions compared with PM2.5 in the pre-wildfire period were associated with 34% increases in asthma admissions. The strongest wildfire-related PM2.5 associations were for people ages 65–99 years (10.1% increase per 10 μg/m3 PM2.5, 95% CI 3.0% to 17.8%) and ages 0–4 years (8.3%, 95% CI 2.2% to 14.9%) followed by ages 20–64 years (4.1%, 95% CI −0.5% to 9.0%). There were no PM2.5–asthma associations in children ages 5–18 years, although their admission rates significantly increased after the fires. Per 10 μg/m3 wildfire-related PM2.5, acute bronchitis admissions across all ages increased by 9.6% (95% CI 1.8% to 17.9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admissions for ages 20–64 years by 6.9% (95% CI 0.9% to 13.1%), and pneumonia admissions for ages 5–18 years by 6.4% (95% CI −1.0% to 14.2%). Acute bronchitis and pneumonia admissions also increased after the fires. There was limited evidence of a small impact of wildfire-related PM2.5 on cardiovascular admissions.

Conclusions: Wildfire-related PM2.5 led to increased respiratory hospital admissions, especially asthma, suggesting that better preventive measures are required to reduce morbidity among vulnerable populations.

https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.041376

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • ▸ Additional information is published online only at http://oem.bmj.com/content/vol66/issue3

    • Funding: This study was funded by the South Coast Air Quality Management District contract no. 04182, and the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant no. ES-11615.

    • Competing interests: None.