Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 19 October 2006
- Published on: 17 July 2006
- Published on: 19 October 2006Re: TCE exposure and NHL - supportive evidenceShow More
(author response)
We appreciate the interest in our recent meta-analysis of occupational trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure and non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL)(1). Three criticisms were mentioned as, “serious limitations”: 1) that the alternative descriptions of the Group I occupational cohort studies (multiple industry vs. aerospace, incidence vs. mortality and Europe vs. U.S. studies) should have been characteri...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 17 July 2006TCE exposure and NHL - supportive evidenceShow More
Dear Editor,
Mandel and colleagues' article on trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) provides an interesting review of relevant studies although it has serious limitations (1).
First, there are three alternative descriptions of their stratification of Group 1 studies: population source (multiple industries vs. only aerospace), outcome (incidence vs. mortality) and location (...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.