Responses

Download PDFPDF
Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Interphone study: results first then methods.

    Dear Editor,

    It is disturbing that the Interphone study group first publishes several papers purportedly finding negative results but only now publishes a validation study showing that the methods used to measure exposure are so deeply flawed that it was unlikely the previously published studies would detect an increase in risk of brain tumour in mobile phone users(1).

    In the validation study of 672 vo...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.