Aims: To examine the association between 2-methoxyethanol (2-ME) exposure and haematological effects, as well as the recovery from these haematological effects with continuous reduction in exposure to 2-ME.
Methods: Twenty nine exposed and 90 non-exposed workers were recruited. Haematological parameters, eight hour full shift personal exposure to 2-ME, and urinary 2-methoxyacetic acid (MAA) were repeatedly measured in three consecutive surveys within six months.
Results: Results of haematological examination in the first exposure survey showed that haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count in the male exposed workers were significantly lower than those in the comparison workers. The frequency of anaemia in the exposed group (42%) was significantly higher than that in the comparison group (3%). The haematological effects were significantly associated with the urinary MAA of exposed workers. The haematological effects had returned to normal in the first follow up survey 2.5 months later, when a reduction in 2-ME exposure was noted. Haematological results of the second follow up examination six months later remained normal. The mean airborne exposure of 2-ME in the three surveys dropped from 35.7 to 2.65, then to 0.55 ppm. The mean urinary MAA of exposed workers in the three surveys was reduced from 57.7 to 24.6, then to 13.5 mg/g creatinine (n = 29). The reduction in exposure through both inhalation and potential dermal contact with 2-ME might account for the haematological recovery.
Conclusion: 2-ME is a haematological toxin which leads to anaemia in exposed workers. However, the toxic haematological effects of 2-ME persist for only a short period of time after cessation or reduction of exposure.
- environmental monitoring
- biological monitoring
- haematological effects
- 2-ME, 2-methoxyethanol
- GC/MS, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
- MAA, 2-methoxyacetic acid
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The solvent 2-methoxyethanol (2-ME) is widely used in various industries as well as the deicing additives in military jet fuel.1,2 The annual consumption of 2-ME is over 3000 tons in Taiwan. There are few reports of the exposure to and toxicity of 2-ME occurring in the copper clad laminate manufacturing industry. With the rapid growth of the semiconductor manufacturing industry in Asia, quantitative exposure assessment and toxicity of 2-ME have become increasingly important.
Animal and human studies have shown that 2-ME can cause adverse reproductive, developmental, and haematological effects through inhalation, dermal absorption, and ingestion.2–7 2-ME is metabolised to 2-methoxy aceticacid (MAA) via alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase.8–10 In humans, the total amount of MAA excreted in the urine accounts for about 85.5% of the inhaled 2-ME.10 No background levels of MAA were found in non-exposed people. In vitro studies have shown that 2-ME itself evokes no toxic responses, either in Sertoli cell culture9 or in rat whole embryo culture, whereas MAA does.11 In vivo studies have shown that equivalent doses of 2-ME and MAA are equally effective in causing adverse effects.9,12,13 Experimental human studies have shown that skin absorption might be the major exposure route of 2-ME.14,15 Traditional airborne exposure monitoring had difficulties in evaluating the uptake of 2-ME through skin absorption. Urinary MAA, therefore, was suggested as a proximate toxicant and as a specific and suitable biomarker of 2-ME exposures by all routes.1,8,11,16–19
Some cases of acute or subacute poisoning have been described in human subjects as a result of accidental ingestion or high environmental exposures.20–29 The very limited epidemiological studies7,30 suggest that exposure of “mixed” ethylene glycol ethers might account for the haematological effects. However, the association was difficult to clarify because of the complicated mixtures of exposed chemicals (mixed glycol ethers and other haematological toxicants) and very limited human exposure data. Although MAA was suggested to be a good indicator to reflect the integrated exposures of 2-ME, urinary MAA has only been investigated in experimental human exposure studies.10,14,15,30 Direct evidence linking the adverse haematological effects and chronic exposure to 2-ME, particularly the toxic metabolite MAA, is lacking.
Our previous study31 showed there to be haematological toxicity (specifically erythropoietic), but no reproductive toxic effects, among workers exposed to 2-ME at two copper clad laminate manufacturing factories. One of these factories agreed to intervention by control measures. The objectives of this study were to follow up the 2-ME exposure (both airborne exposure of 2-ME and urinary MAA) and the haematological effects, and to examine the reduction in haematological effects through the continuous improvement in working conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty nine impregnation workers (24 males and five females) from the coating department of a copper clad laminate manufacturing plant were recruited as the study population. A group of 90 workers, including 32 heat press workers whose working place was adjacent to the coating department and 58 workers from the administrative department working in a separate building, were selected as the comparison group. All participants were informed and signed consent forms. All were asked not to consume alcohol or medication, and were asked to avoid exposure to other organic solvents during the study period.
Regular operations in the copper clad laminate manufacturing process include mixing, implantation, drying, cutting, lamination, trimming, and inspection. The main raw materials used in these plants include epoxy and phenolic resins, hardener (dicyanamide), catalyst (2-methylimidazole), antimony oxide, aluminium oxide, silica dioxide, titanium oxide, pigments, acetone, and 2-ME. 2-ME and acetone are the only two volatile chemicals used in this workplace. The solvent of the coating glue contains 70% 2-ME and 30% acetone. The qualitative confirmation of 2-ME in both raw materials and randomly selected air samples was reconfirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
Questionnaires were used to collect information on personal characteristics, personal habits (for example, alcohol consumption and smoking), reproductive history, detailed occupational history, and related symptoms.
The first exposure survey was held in February 1997, and a personal weekly mean of five day, eight hour full shift mean concentration was used to evaluate the mean airborne exposure of 2-ME for the 29 exposed workers. In the first and second follow up exposure surveys held in April and August, the eight hour full shift personal samples were collected for one day. For the comparison group workers, eight hour full shift personal samples were randomly selected for nine of the 32 workers in the heat press operation, and eight hour full shift fixed point air samples were evenly collected in 10 locations of the administrative department for one day in the first exposure survey.
Airborne 2-ME exposures were measured by Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) 1215 recommended sampling and analytical method,32 originating from the US NIOSH 1403 and the OSHA 79 method. Active samples are collected by drawing air through standard size (100 mg/50 mg) coconut shell charcoal tubes. Predrying tubes were connected to some of the charcoal tubes to remove water vapour. The materials collected were desorbed in 1 ml of a mixed solvent of 95/5 (v/v) dichloromethane and methanol. The desorbed 2-ME was analysed by gas chromatography with flame ionisation detection. This method was fully validated by the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH), Taipei, Taiwan and also by two reference laboratories before it was adopted in this study. GC/MS analysis of bulk samples and randomly selected air samples confirmed that 2-ME and acetone were the only two volatile chemicals in the workplace.
Spot urine samples were collected from both exposed and comparison group workers after they had finished their shift (post-shift) on Friday in three exposure surveys for comparison. Urinary MAA was determined by a previously reported method.33 This method was fully validated by IOSH and also by two reference laboratories before it was adopted in this study. Urinary creatinine was analysed by the Jaffe method for concentration correction.
About 10 ml of blood was collected for all participants in the medical department of the factory by an occupational physician in the next workweek after air samples were collected in the three surveys. Haematological parameters, including haemoglobin, packed cell volume, white blood cells, red blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, were examined in each survey. In addition, liver and renal function, routine urine tests, and neurological symptoms were checked during each physical examination. All blood samples collected in the three surveys were examined by the same hospital; 44 randomly selected blood samples were analysed for haemoglobin by a second hospital as a check of quality control.
Student’s t test and χ2 test were used to compare differences of haematological parameters between the exposed and comparison groups. Analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used to compare differences in haematological outcomes among the three surveys. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the dose-response relation between airborne 2-ME concentrations or urinary MAA concentrations and haematological outcome.
Distribution of characteristics among study subjects
No significant differences in the distribution of characteristics (age, duration of employment, body mass index, sex, martial status, or smoking status) were found between 29 exposed and 90 comparison workers (table 1). Most workers were males; about half were smokers. Mean duration of employment was about three years.
Environmental and biological monitoring data
For the first exposure survey, the personal five day weekly mean concentration of airborne 2-ME in the exposed group was 35.7 ppm (SD 77.9, range 0.75–320 ppm, n = 29) (table 2). Much higher peak daily exposure was detected for glue preparation and machine cleaning operations. The exposure to 2-ME for heat press workers in the comparison group was 0.19 ppm (SD 0.30, range ND–0.80 ppm, n = 9). The eight hour full shift mean fixed point air samples showed that no 2-ME was detected in the administrative department.
The mean post-shift urinary MAA concentration on Friday of exposed workers was 57.7 mg/g creatinine (SD 31.8, range 24.3–139 mg/g creatinine, n = 29) A low concentration of MAA was found in some heat press workers whose working position was closely adjacent to the coating department. The mean MAA concentration of 32 workers in the heat press operation was 1.02 mg/g creatinine (SD 1.25, range ND–4.22 mg/g creatinine, n = 32). No MAA was detected in the comparison workers from the administrative department.
For the first follow up exposure survey, the personal eight hour full shift mean concentration of airborne 2-ME of the study group was 2.65 ppm (SD 1.53, range 0.2–10 ppm, n = 29). The mean post-shift urinary MAA concentration on Friday of exposed workers was 24.6 mg/g creatinine (SD 14.7, range 4.6–54.9 mg/g creatinine, n = 29) (table 2).
For the second follow up exposure survey, the personal eight hour full shift mean concentration of airborne 2-ME of the study group was 0.55 ppm (SD 0.73, range 0.1–3.5 ppm, n = 29) The mean post-shift urinary MAA concentration on Friday of exposed workers was 13.5 mg/g creatinine (SD 10.6, range 0.95–25.2 mg/g creatinine, n = 29) (table 2).
Table 2 presents a summary of results of both airborne 2-ME and urinary MAA concentrations obtained from the baseline and two follow up surveys; a decreasing trend is seen. A combination of engineering controls and improvement in working practices accounts for the reduction in 2-ME exposure.
Baseline haematological outcome and its relation to 2-ME exposure
High correlation was found between the results of haemoglobin values of randomly selected split samples analysed by two hospitals (r = 0.951, p < 0.001, n = 44). Table 3 shows results of haematological examination and exposure assessment stratified by gender for the first exposure survey. Haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count were significantly lower in male exposed workers than in male comparison group workers. However, there were no significant differences in haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count among female workers. The exposure levels of 2-ME and urinary MAA in the male exposed workers were significantly higher than those in both female exposed workers and comparison group workers (p < 0.001).
If the cut off points for abnormal values in males for haemoglobin of 135 g/l, packed cell volume of 40%, red blood cell count of 4.5 × 1012/l, white blood cell count of 5 × 109/l, and platelets of 150 × 109/l were used, the mean proportion of abnormal values in the baseline survey for haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count in the exposed male workers (42%) would be significantly higher than those of the comparison control male workers (3%) (p < 0.001).
The multiple regression model in the baseline survey showed that red blood cell count was significantly and negatively associated with airborne 2-ME concentration. Table 4 shows that haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count were significantly and negatively associated with urinary MAA. However, white blood cell and platelet counts were not associated with either airborne 2-ME or urinary MAA concentrations.
Haematological changes in six months
Table 5 shows changes in haematological parameters for male 2-ME-exposed workers in the three surveys. Haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count were found to have returned to normal values in both the first (2.5 months later) and the second (six months later) follow up exposure surveys. In addition, a significant increasing trend was noted for haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count. Although the platelet count was still within the normal limits, a significant decreasing trend was also noted. No significant trend was found for white blood cells, lymphocytes, or neutrophil counts. No significant trend was found among the three surveys for female exposed workers.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the only study that longitudinally examines changes in haematological effects and documents a continuous reduction in exposure to 2-ME with reliable exposure data on both airborne exposure and workers’ urinary MAA. The few previous epidemiological studies7,30 examined the health effects using very limited cross sectional exposure data without excluding the co-exposure of other complicating haematological toxicants. This study provides strong supporting evidence for the toxicity of 2-ME as well as additional information on what “low” exposure is and how quickly these health effects decrease or are avoided if improvements are carried out.
After the first exposure survey, the authors recommended that this copper clad laminate manufacturing enterprise should carry out some critical interventions under our supervision. All coating machinery was installed in the enclosed rooms with aluminium sliding doors. Incinerators were installed above each coating machine to burn off the waste solvent exhaust vapours. New local ventilation was installed in areas of raw material mixing, charging, and discharging. Workers were asked to wear respirators and rubber gloves (cotton gloves were stringently prohibited) when they entered the coating rooms for maintenance, troubleshooting, or for machine cleaning. They were also asked to stay in the coating rooms for as short a time as possible and to close the door immediately when they left. All spills of glues and solvents were cleaned up immediately. With the close collaboration of the employer, managers, employees, engineers, occupational safety and health professionals in this factory, and IOSH researchers, workers’ 2-ME exposures and their urinary MAA concentrations were significantly reduced in a very short period of time.
Several studies have shown that skin absorption is a major exposure route for 2-ME.14,15,34 Urinary MAA, therefore, was recommended as a specific and suitable indicator for occupational exposure to 2-ME by all routes and may reflect the concentration of the “active agent” at the target sites.1 In this study, urinary MAA showed a significant negative dose-response relation with haematological parameters. In the follow up surveys, workers’ haematological parameters and urinary MAA rapidly decreased after their airborne exposures were reduced. This shows that the haematological effects might be caused by a combination of moderately high inhalation exposure and repeated skin exposure to 2-ME. Urinary MAA might be a specific and suitable biomarker of integrated exposure to 2-ME.
All raw materials, operating conditions, manufacturing facilities, productivity, and working hours remained quite similar during the entire year. GC/MS analysis confirmed that 2-ME and acetone were the only two volatile raw materials. No haematological toxicants other than MAA were used in this workplace. 2-ME is not used in commercial products in Taiwan.34 No background urinary MAA was detected in the non-exposed administrative department workers. This is consistent with results of previous reports.1,17
Haematological disorders including leukopenia, lymphocytosis, pancytopenia, marrow depression, and decreased red blood cell count, haemoglobin, and platelet count have been reported as the most common health effects of 2-ME.24,25,27,29,35 Similar haematological disorders, including decreased concentrations of haemoglobin and packed cell volume, decreased white and red blood cell counts, reduced bone marrow cellularity, and reduced erythropoiesis and haemolysis have also been confirmed in animal studies with 2-ME exposure.1 In addition to case reports and animal studies, haematological effects of 2-ME intoxication were also found in several epidemiological investigations.7,22,30 Our study also depicts a higher proportion of anaemia and lower mean haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell counts in the male exposed group in comparison with the male comparison group. However, the white blood cell and platelet counts were not reduced in the exposed group. These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that high exposure to 2-ME will induce haematological defects. There were no significant differences in haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count among female workers. Female workers stayed mainly in the location of product compiling, which was far from the emission source with much lower exposures. Furthermore, the sample size of female exposed workers was very small (n = 5). These observations could explain why there were no statistical differences in the female haematological parameters.
Both animal studies and case reports have shown that the haematological changes can return to normal several weeks to several months after eliminating or reducing exposure.1,8,25,28,29 Cohen reported a 2-ME intoxication case showing that the haematological effects were reduced to normal one month after eliminating the exposure.25 Larese et al also reported that three 2-ME induced haematological effects returned to normal on eliminating the exposure.35 Our follow up observations confirm the reversibility of 2-ME induced haematological effects.
This study illustrates the value of periodical health examinations where there are appropriate medical tests available to assess the effects of an occupational toxin. Haematological effects have been reported with 2-ME toxicity. The study suggests that complete blood count parameters, particularly depression of haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell count, might be good indicators for adverse effects of 2-ME.
In conclusion, 2-ME can induce reversible toxic effects, and the hematopoietic system seems to be the main target of chronic exposure. However, the toxic haematological effects of 2-ME persist for only a short period of time after eliminating or reducing exposures. Since skin absorption (either liquid contact or whole body vapour absorption) is difficult to avoid completely, it is not sufficient to only monitor exposure through inhalation. Urinary MAA is a suitable and specific biomarker of integrated exposure to 2-ME.
This work was supported by a grant (IOSH-90-A307) from the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Council of Labor Affairs, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.