Responses

Download PDFPDF

Multiple sclerosis in nurse anaesthetists
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Trace anaesthetic gases and multiple sclerosis
    • Diana G Mcgregor, Anesthesiologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Richard Mazze, Jeffrey Baden

    Dear Editor

    We would like to comment on the study by Flodin et al.[1] We believe it has multiple methodological flaws and does not add to the understanding of the relationship of exposure to trace concentrations of waste anesthetic gases and the health of operating room workers.

    First, the method of data collection, i.e, by an “appeal” (authors’ word)” in a trade journal for nurses for individ...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.