Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- ADHD, attention deficity hyperactivity disorder
- DDA, Disability Discrimination Act
- IDDM, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
The purpose of this study was to gain employers’ views on employment restrictions for young people with four medical conditions—asthma, epilepsy, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).
A questionnaire was sent to Directors of Occupational Health and Personnel of 15 national companies and recruitment offices of the Royal Navy, RAF, Army, and the police. Respondents were asked for details of policies for applicants with asthma, epilepsy, ADHD, and IDDM and potentially unsuitable jobs.
Response rate was 75%. Specific conditions will be considered separately.
The Armed Forces had clear policies—asthma is generally incompatible with service requirements. Exceptions may be considered for those: (a) who have been asymptomatic during the previous four years; and (b) whose earlier symptoms did not require long term/maintenance therapy with theophyllines, nebulisers, or steroids, unless associated with a proven chest infection.
Only two companies had policies. Free text comments included: “our policy originally excluded asthmatics from soldering, but now asthmatics are not ‘screened out’ as proper extraction systems are in place”; “isocyanate spraying jobs are unsuitable”.
The Armed Forces have clear guidelines—those with epilepsy or those who have had more than one seizure after the age of 5 are unfit for enlistment. Those who have had a single seizure more than four years before entry, and are off treatment, may gain entry to a restricted number of trades, provided that there is no evidence of predisposition to epilepsy. Those who had febrile convulsions at less than 5 years of age, without subsequent seizures, may be enlisted in all trades.
Four companies had specific policies. Comments included: “certain jobs are excluded by law or ‘common sense’, e.g. heavy goods vehicle driver, work involving fast moving unguarded machinery”; “for jobs involving ‘safety critical’ work the risk of fits would have to be very low”.
The Armed Forces stated that candidates with hyperactivity, uncomplicated by violence or criminality, absent for more than two years without treatment, may be fit for enlistment. Respondents from the police forces were unaware of candidates declaring ADHD, but stated that “psychiatric/developmental history is important in considering police recruits”.
Although no company had an ADHD policy, several made comments: “I’m not sure how many would declare this”; “employment may depend on medication side effects”.
Individuals with IDDM are excluded from the Armed Forces and police. Only two companies had policies. Comments included: “some jobs are precluded by law, e.g. pilot, HGV driver, all other cases will be considered on their merits”; “consideration would be given to difficulties arising out of unsociable working”.
Some medical conditions restrict employment choices; early advice may help career planning.1 This is the rationale behind colour vision screening, but even this may not be done adequately. One respondent said: “one common pre-employment problem is colour blindness; in severe cases certain jobs are unsafe, e.g. electrician, or inappropriate, e.g. accurate colour matching—sadly a significant number are not advised that their choice of career may be restricted, so it may be a severe blow to be rejected”.
Companies varied in their individual policies. Many referred to the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)2: “the Disability Discrimination Act makes it legally necessary to consider all candidates, bearing in mind that most can be accommodated by making reasonable adjustment to the job”. Exceptions quoted were asthmatics working with chemicals, or those with epilepsy working at heights.
Many respondents referred to the DVLA guidelines in relation to driving or jobs working with machinery.3 These guidelines produced for medical practitioners are sent to all doctors except paediatricians; they are not thought to need this information. Many paediatricians are unaware of regulations regarding group 2 vehicle licences—those with IDDM are excluded as are those with epilepsy until fit free for more than 10 years off treatment.
The Armed Forces have strict guidance for enlistment.4 Recruits must be fit to serve anywhere in the world, in all environments where medical care and drug supply may be limited. Their physicians encourage interested young people to personally contact them when making career decisions.
The police distinguish between employment of officers and support staff. There was variation between forces in policies. One excluded candidates using any inhalers, while others specified only steroid inhalers.
Respondents appeared currently unaware of potential employees declaring ADHD; as this condition is diagnosed more frequently, inevitably it will need to be addressed. Approximately half of the young people diagnosed with ADHD will continue to have significant problems with concentration, impulsivity, and social interaction which may lead to work difficulties.5 There appears to be little guidance—ADHD is not indexed in the Royal College of Physicians, Faculty of Occupational Medicine textbook.6
As this study was in progress, “Connexions” was launched. This national government funded service (for 13–19 year olds) aims to identify barriers to progress in education and employment. Connexions personal advisors can make contact with employers who have specific enquiries, acting as advocates for young people (www.connexions.gov.uk).
The DDA2 has made most civilian jobs accessible, but there remain significant restrictions in the Armed Forces and police. Paediatricians need training to fulfil two potential roles: as advocates nationally, lobbying to ensure that restrictions are based on evidence; and secondly to actively discuss career decisions with our patients. “Connexions” may be useful for this second role.
Reproduced in full with permission from Arch Dis Child 2002;87:291–292