Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Ultrafine particles
  1. K Donaldsona,b,
  2. V Stonea,b,
  3. A Cloutera,
  4. L Renwicka,
  5. W MacNeeb
  1. aBiomedicine Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Napier University, 10 Colinton Rd, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, bEdinburgh Lung and the Environment Group Initiative Colt Research Laboratories, University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
  1. Professor K Donaldson, Biomedicine Research Group, School of Life, Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK k.donaldson{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

There is a long history of disease caused by inhaled particles that stretches from Agricola and Paracelsus in the 14th century up to the present.1 In this century the twin scourges of asbestos and crystalline silica (quartz) have exerted a terrible toll of death and disease. The bad old days when these dust related lung diseases were unbridled are gone but as we enter the 21st century a new particle type—the ultrafine particle—has emerged as one with a potential role in causing disease. Ultrafine particles have been the subject of several recent reviews.2 3

Ultrafine particles

Particles that are less than 100 nm in diameter are commonly defined as ultrafine. However, all particle populations that are found in the air are polydispersed—that is, they comprise particles with ranges of diameters that are usually summarised as mean or median diameter. There is no reason at the moment to think that there is much difference between a 90 nm and a 110 nm particle in ability to have an adverse effect and there is little evidence for the cut off point for the ultrafine effect. Ultrafine particles are very small compared with the cellular structures and so this may be important in the apparent problems they present to the lung (fig 1).

Figure 1

Relation between ultrafine particles and cellular structures in the lung. Idealised particles of 10, 1, and 0.1 μm are shown compared with a bronchial epithelium; note that the top end of the range of ultrafine particles (0.1 μm, 100 nm) is not really visible. On the right are shown the same three particles relative to cilia.

Particles of diesel exhaust may be taken as an example of an ultrafine particle, albeit complex. They are largely insoluble because of the particulate carbon core, commonly the size of singlet diesel particles, …

View Full Text

Linked Articles