Responses

Download PDFPDF

Survey of symptoms, respiratory function, and immunology and their relation to glutaraldehyde and other occupational exposures among endoscopy nursing staff
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re: Glutaraldehyde induced asthma in endoscopy nursing staff
    • A Vyas
    • Other Contributors:
      • "R McL Niven, CAC Pickering"

    Editor

    Dr Burge and his coworkers raise a very important issue in terms of the physiological criteria on which a diagnosis of occupational asthma should be based, and in particular, the clinical significance of small work related declines in peak expiratory flow. We fully accept that a lack of an increase in diurnal variation does not exclude a diagnosis of occupational asthma. The pattern of peak flow measurements...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Glutaraldehyde induced asthma in endoscopy nursing staff

    Editor

    We read with interest the paper on glutaraldehyde and symptoms in endoscopy nursing staff.[1] It is reported that there was an absence of objective evidence of the physiological changes associated with asthma. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) records from 17 cases were analysed by the Oasys 2 computer program, and three of these had Oasys-2 Scores >2.5. These cases were felt not to show asthma because PEF d...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Symptoms among endoscopy nursing staff

    The recent article by Vyas, et al.[1] raises some concerns to which I would be grateful if they could respond.

    1) In the abstract one of the objectives is stated as finding the nature and incidence of symptoms experienced by a large sample of hospital endoscopy nurses. The study design is cross-sectional and used an adapted version of the MRC questionnaire for respiratory symptoms. This study design normally re...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.