<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com">
<title>Occupational and Environmental Medicine recent issues</title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com</link>
<description>Occupational and Environmental Medicine RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Occupational and Environmental Medicine</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1351-0711</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/437?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/446?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/453?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/464?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/471?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/476?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/498?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/505?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/508?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/519?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/519-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/520?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/520-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.oem.bmj.com/homepage/OEM_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.oem.bmj.com/homepage/OEM_95x60.gif">
<title>Occupational and Environmental Medicine</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.oem.bmj.com/homepage/OEM_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/437?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['What really stands behind the numbers?': occupational diseases and their social construction]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/437?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec> <p>In the paper published in the May issue of this journal, Carder <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> put forward a new and original hypothesis, derived from the symmetrical evolution observed between mental ill-health and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among UK workers in general, and healthcare workers more specifically. The authors propose that there might be &lsquo;a shift in the presentation of ill health from a physical to a psychological perspective&rsquo;. Could, to some extent, these relatively broad medical categories of MSD and mental ill-health, express in another way distress experienced at work? This new interesting hypothesis, in turn, generates questions related to what occupational surveillance schemes really measure about a complex phenomenon.</p> <p>First, this article is based on the analysis of longitudinal data produced by a well-designed scheme of medical reporting (either by general practitioners or specialist physicians), namely, the &lsquo;THOR&rsquo; system, a well-known surveillance scheme. The authors have demonstrated...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonneterre, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2013-101377</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2013-101377</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA['What really stands behind the numbers?': occupational diseases and their social construction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>437</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>438</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/439?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can mental health and readjustment be improved in UK military personnel by a brief period of structured postdeployment rest (third location decompression)?]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/439?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Third Location Decompression (TLD) is an activity undertaken by UK Armed Forces (UK AF) personnel at the end of an operational deployment which aims to smooth the transition between operations and returning home. We assessed whether TLD impacted upon both mental health and postdeployment readjustment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Data collected during a large cohort study was examined to identify personnel who either engaged in TLD or returned home directly following deployment. Propensity scores were generated and used to calculate inverse probability of treatment weights in adjusted regression analyses to compare mental health outcomes and postdeployment readjustment problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>TLD had a positive impact upon mental health outcomes (post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and multiple physical symptoms) and levels of harmful alcohol use. However, when the samples were stratified by combat exposure, although postdeployment readjustment was similar for all exposure levels, personnel experiencing low and moderate levels of combat exposure experienced the greatest positive mental health effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We found no evidence to suggest that TLD promotes better postdeployment readjustment; however, we found a positive impact upon alcohol use and mental health with an interaction with degree of combat exposure. This study suggests that TLD is a useful postdeployment transitional activity that may help to improve PTSD symptoms and alcohol use in UK AF personnel.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, N., Jones, M., Fear, N. T., Fertout, M., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101229</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101229</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can mental health and readjustment be improved in UK military personnel by a brief period of structured postdeployment rest (third location decompression)?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>439</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>445</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/446?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Work-related allergic respiratory disease and asthma in spice mill workers is associated with inhalant chili pepper and garlic exposures]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/446?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for allergic respiratory disease in spice mill workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study of 150 workers used European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaires, Phadiatop, serum specific IgE (garlic, chili pepper), spirometry and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Personal air samples (n=62) collected from eight-hour shifts were analysed for inhalable particulate mass. Novel immunological assays quantified airborne garlic and chili pepper allergen concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mean dust particulate mass (geometric mean (GM)=2.06&nbsp;mg/m<sup>3</sup>), chili pepper (GM=0.44&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>) and garlic allergen (GM=0.24&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>) were highest in blending and were highly correlated. Workers&rsquo; mean age was 33&nbsp;years, 71% were men, 46% current smokers and 45% atopic. Spice-dust-related asthma-like symptoms (17%) were common, as was garlic sensitisation (19%), with 13% being monosensitised and 6% cosensitised to chili pepper. Airflow reversibility and FeNO&gt;50&nbsp;ppb was present in 4% and 8% of workers respectively. Spice-dust-related ocular-nasal (OR 2.40, CI 1.09 to 5.27) and asthma-like (OR 4.15, CI 1.09 to 15.72) symptoms were strongly associated with airborne garlic in the highly exposed (&gt;0.235&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>) workers. Workers monosensitised to garlic were more likely to be exposed to higher airborne chili pepper (&gt;0.92&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>) (OR 11.52, CI 1.17 to 113.11) than garlic allergens (OR 5.08, CI 1.17 to 22.08) in this mill. Probable asthma was also more strongly associated with chili pepper than with garlic sensitisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Exposure to inhalable spice dust (GM &gt;2.06&nbsp;mg/m<sup>3</sup>) containing garlic (GM&gt;0.24&nbsp;&micro;g/m&sup3;) and chili pepper (GM &gt;0.44&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>) allergens increase the risk of allergic respiratory disease and asthma.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Walt, A., Singh, T., Baatjies, R., Lopata, A. L., Jeebhay, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Work-related allergic respiratory disease and asthma in spice mill workers is associated with inhalant chili pepper and garlic exposures]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>446</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>452</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/453?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mortality and ionising radiation exposures among workers employed at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center (1951-1985)]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/453?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine mortality patterns and dose-response relations between ionising radiation and mortality outcomes of a priori interest in 6409 uranium workers employed for at least 30&nbsp;days (1951&ndash;1985), and followed through 2004.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Cohort mortality was evaluated through standardised mortality ratios (SMR). Linear excess relative risk (ERR) regression models examined associations between cause-specific mortality and exposures to internal ionising radiation from uranium deposition, external gamma and x-ray radiation, and radon decay products, while adjusting for non-radiologic covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Person-years at risk totalled 236&nbsp;568 (mean follow-up 37&nbsp;years), and 43% of the cohort had died. All-cause mortality was below expectation only in salaried workers. Cancer mortality was significantly elevated in hourly males, primarily from excess lung cancer (SMR=1.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.42). Cancer mortality in salaried males was near expectation, but lymphohaematopoietic malignancies were significantly elevated (SMR=1.52, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.12). A positive dose-response relation was observed for intestinal cancer, with a significant elevation in the highest internal organ dose category and a significant dose-response with organ dose from internal uranium deposition (ERR=1.5 per 100&nbsp;&mu;Gy, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.1).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A healthy worker effect was observed only in salaried workers. Hourly workers had excess cancer mortality compared with the US population, although there was little evidence of a dose-response trend for any cancer evaluated except intestinal cancer. The association between non-malignant respiratory disease and radiation dose observed in previous studies was not apparent, possibly due to improved exposure assessment, different outcome groupings, and extended follow-up.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silver, S. R., Bertke, S. J., Hein, M. J., Daniels, R. D., Fleming, D. A., Anderson, J. L., Pinney, S. M., Hornung, R. W., Tseng, C.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-100768</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-100768</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mortality and ionising radiation exposures among workers employed at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center (1951-1985)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>453</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>463</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/464?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Occupation and risk of lymphoid and myeloid leukaemia in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/464?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Established risk factors for leukaemia do not explain the majority of leukaemia cases. Previous studies have suggested the importance of occupation and related exposures in leukaemogenesis. We evaluated possible associations between job title and selected hazardous agents and leukaemia in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The mean follow-up time for 241&nbsp;465 subjects was 11.20&nbsp;years (SD 2.42&nbsp;years). During the follow-up period, 477 incident cases of myeloid and lymphoid leukaemia occurred. Data on 52 occupations considered a priori to be at high risk of developing cancer were collected through standardised questionnaires. Occupational exposures were estimated by linking the reported occupations to a job exposure matrix. Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the association between occupation and related exposures and risk of leukaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The risk of lymphoid leukaemia significantly increased for working in chemical laboratories (HR 8.35, 95% CI 1.58 to 44.24), while the risk of myeloid leukaemia increased for working in the shoe or other leather goods industry (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.06). Exposure-specific analyses showed a non-significant increased risk of myeloid leukaemias for exposure to benzene (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.40; HR=1.60, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.69 for the low and high exposure categories, respectively). This association was present both for acute and chronic myeloid leukaemia at high exposure levels. However, numbers were too small to reach statistical significance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings suggest a possible role of occupational exposures in the development of both lymphoid and myeloid leukaemia. Exposure to benzene seemed to be associated with both acute and chronic myeloid leukaemia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saberi Hosnijeh, F., Christopher, Y., Peeters, P., Romieu, I., Xun, W., Riboli, E., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Tjonneland, A., Becker, N., Nieters, A., Trichopoulou, A., Bamia, C., Orfanos, P., Oddone, E., Lujan-Barroso, L., Dorronsoro, M., Navarro, C., Barricarte, A., Molina-Montes, E., Wareham, N., Vineis, P., Vermeulen, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other exposures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Occupation and risk of lymphoid and myeloid leukaemia in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>470</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/471?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Occupational asthma and occupational rhinitis: the united airways disease model revisited]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/471?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Whereas accumulating evidence indicates close associations between rhinitis and asthma, little is known about the relationships between occupational rhinitis (OR) and occupational asthma (OA). This study analyses the prevalence of OR associated with OA, globally and according to the various causal agents, and investigates the temporal relationships between these two conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data on incident cases of OA (2008&ndash;2010) were collected through the French national occupational disease surveillance and prevention network, using a standardised form including information on occupation, causal agents, presence of OR, and respective dates of occurrence of rhinitis and asthma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 596 reported OA cases with latency period, 555 could be attributed to identified agents: high molecular weight (HMW) agents (n=174); low molecular weight (LMW) agents (n=381). Overall, OR was associated with OA in 324 (58.4%) cases. The frequency of association was significantly higher for HMW agents than for LMW agents (72.2% vs 51.5%, p&lt;0.001). OR occurred before OA significantly more frequently for HMW agents than for LMW agents (p&lt;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These results show that OR is frequently associated with OA, especially when HMW agents are involved. They are consistent with the hypothesis that OR, in conjunction with OA, is more likely to be caused by sensitisers that cause disease via IgE-mediated mechanisms and suggest that symptoms of OR should be taken into account in the medical surveillance of workers exposed to HMW agents.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ameille, J., Hamelin, K., Andujar, P., Bensefa-Colas, L., Bonneterre, V., Dupas, D., Garnier, R., Lodde, B. A., Rinaldo, M., Descatha, A., Lasfargues, G., Pairon, J.-C., the members of the rnv3p, Doutrellot-Philippon, Thaon, Brochard, Verdun-Esquer, Dewitte, Lodde, Letourneux, Clin, Marquignon, Chamoux, Gabrillargues, Pairon, Andujar, Ameille, Descatha, de Gaudemaris, Bonneterre, Gislard, Lepage, Nisse, Bergeret, Normand, Le Hucher-Michel, Roulet, Paris, Penven, Dupas, Choudat, Bensefa-Colas, Garnier, Villa, Ben-Brik, Berson, Deschamps, Lesage, Gehanno, Fontana, Orset, Cantineau, Kleinogel, Soulat, Herin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101048</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101048</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Allergy, asthma, Respiratory]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Occupational asthma and occupational rhinitis: the united airways disease model revisited]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>471</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>475</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/476?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact of national level interventions on workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 1--changes in workplace exposure legislation and market forces]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/476?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The 2004 amendment to the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health 2002 regulations (COSHH 2004) introducing workplace exposure limits (WELs) was enacted in the UK in 2005. This study aimed to determine whether introducing this legislation coincided with a reduction in the incidence of work-related short latency respiratory disease (SLRD) attributed to the agents with a WEL. The second objective was to determine whether changes in legislation, WELs and market forces coincided with a reduction in the incidence of SLRD attributed to glutaraldehyde and latex.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Reports of SLRD made to the Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease scheme were used to estimate the change in incidence within reporters between two time periods (interrupted time series design) using a longitudinal, negative binomial regression model with &beta; distributed random effects. A statistical interaction term was included in the model to make comparisons between the groups defined by suspected causal agent and/or occupation, essentially comparing two interrupted time series. Time periods were defined prospectively representing the changes in legislation or market forces.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The introduction of the COSHH 2004 legislation in the UK coincided with a significant reduction in reports of SLRD attributed to agents with a WEL relative to those without a WEL (ratio of incidence rate ratios: 0.70; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.93) and a significant reduction in SLRD attributed to glutaraldehyde in healthcare workers (0.20; 0.07 to 0.57) and latex in all workers (0.37; 0.16 to 0.85).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These data are consistent with a beneficial effect of legislation aiming to reduce workplace exposures.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stocks, S. J., McNamee, R., Turner, S., Carder, M., Agius, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Respiratory, Other exposures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact of national level interventions on workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 1--changes in workplace exposure legislation and market forces]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>476</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact of national level interventions on workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 2--regulatory activity by the Health and Safety Executive]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate whether interventions implemented by the UK Health and Safety Executive addressing exposure to isocyanate-based spray paints in motor vehicle repair (MVR), flour dust in craft bakeries, rosin-based solder flux fume (RBSFF) in the electronics industry, metalworking fluids and wood dust coincided with a decline in incidence of work-related short latency respiratory disease (SLRD) or asthma in the target groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Changes in the incidence of SLRD reported to a UK-based surveillance scheme were compared using a longitudinal, negative binomial regression model with &beta; distributed random effects. An interrupted time series design was used and comparisons according to inclusion or exclusion in the target group were made by including a statistical interactions expressed as a ratio of incidence rate ratios (RIRRs) in the model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The incidence of SLRD attributed to flour dust significantly increased relative to all other agents (RIRR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.16) whereas SLRD attributed to RBSFF significantly declined relative to all other agents (0.94; 0.90 to 0.99). No significant changes in the incidence of SLRD attributed to wood dust (1.03; 0.91 to 1.16) or spray paints (1.03; 0.95 to 1.11) relative to all other agents were observed. A higher proportion of reports originated from the industries targeted by the intervention for RBSFF (65/107; 61%) than spray painting (27/93; 27%) or wood dust (16/42; 38%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These data support a beneficial effect of interventions to reduce exposure to RBSFF but an increase in SLRD attributed to flour dust may indicate increased exposure or increased awareness of the problem.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stocks, S. J., McNamee, R., Turner, S., Carder, M., Agius, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact of national level interventions on workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 2--regulatory activity by the Health and Safety Executive]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>490</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of the impact of lifting device use on low back pain and musculoskeletal injury claims among nurses]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate the effect of manually lifting patients on the occurrence of low back pain (LBP) among nurses, and (2) to estimate the impact of lifting device use on the prevention of LBP and musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) injury claims.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A literature search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science identified studies with a quantitative assessment of the effect of manually lifting patients on LBP occurrence and studies on the impact of introducing lifting devices on LBP and MSD injury claims. A Markov decision analysis model was constructed for a health impact assessment of patient lifting device use in healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The best scenario, based on observational and experimental studies, showed a maximum reduction in LBP prevalence from 41.9% to 40.5% and in MSD injury claims from 5.8 to 5.6 per 100 work-years. Complete elimination of manually lifting patients would reduce the LBP prevalence to 31.4% and MSD injury claims to 4.3 per 100 work-years. These results were sensitive to the strengths of the association between manually patient lifting and LBP as well as the prevalence of manual lifting of patients. A realistic variant of the baseline scenario requires well over 25&nbsp;000 healthcare workers to demonstrate effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study indicates that good implementation of lifting devices is required to noticeably reduce LBP and injury claims. This health impact assessment may guide intervention studies as well as implementation of programmes to reduce manual lifting of patients in healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burdorf, A., Koppelaar, E., Evanoff, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101210</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101210</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of the impact of lifting device use on low back pain and musculoskeletal injury claims among nurses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>497</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/498?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dose-response relationship between hand-transmitted vibration and hand-arm vibration syndrome in a tropical environment]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/498?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The dose&ndash;response relationship for hand-transmitted vibration has been investigated extensively in temperate environments. Since the clinical features of hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) differ between the temperate and tropical environment, we conducted this study to investigate the dose&ndash;response relationship of HAVS in a tropical environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 173 male construction, forestry and automobile manufacturing plant workers in Malaysia were recruited into this study between August 2011 and 2012. The participants were interviewed for history of vibration exposure and HAVS symptoms, followed by hand functions evaluation and vibration measurement. Three types of vibration doses&mdash;lifetime vibration dose (LVD), total operating time (TOT) and cumulative exposure index (CEI)&mdash;were calculated and its log values were regressed against the symptoms of HAVS. The correlation between each vibration exposure dose and the hand function evaluation results was obtained.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The adjusted prevalence ratio for finger tingling and numbness was 3.34 (95% CI 1.27 to 8.98) for subjects with lnLVD&ge;20&nbsp;ln&nbsp;m<sup>2</sup>&nbsp;s<sup>&ndash;4</sup> against those &lt;16&nbsp;ln&nbsp;m<sup>2</sup>&nbsp;s<sup>&ndash;4</sup>. Similar dose&ndash;response pattern was found for CEI but not for TOT. No subject reported white finger. The prevalence of finger coldness did not increase with any of the vibration doses. Vibrotactile perception thresholds correlated moderately with lnLVD and lnCEI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The dose&ndash;response relationship of HAVS in a tropical environment is valid for finger tingling and numbness. The LVD and CEI are more useful than TOT when evaluating the dose&ndash;response pattern of a heterogeneous group of vibratory tools workers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Su, A. T., Maeda, S., Fukumoto, J., Darus, A., Hoe, V. C. W., Miyai, N., Isahak, M., Takemura, S., Bulgiba, A., Yoshimasu, K., Miyashita, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101321</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101321</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Vibration]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dose-response relationship between hand-transmitted vibration and hand-arm vibration syndrome in a tropical environment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Workplace</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>498</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>504</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/505?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence of myocardial infarction in Swedish chimney sweeps 1991-2005: a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/505?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Previous studies of chimney sweeps have shown an excess mortality from cardiovascular diseases, although the extent of confounding from tobacco smoking is uncertain. The present study used referents of similar socioeconomic background as the chimney sweeps in order to reduce confounding, included both lethal and surviving cases of myocardial infarction, and investigated dose&ndash;response in terms of duration of employment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cohort of 4436 male chimney sweeps was identified from nationwide trade union records from 1918 to 2006. Myocardial infarctions during 1991&ndash;2005 were identified from the Swedish nationwide register of first-time myocardial infarctions. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were estimated using skilled manual workers in the service sector in Sweden to calculate expected numbers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was a strong and statistically significant excess of myocardial infarction among the chimney sweeps, SIR 1.39 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.55). The excess was observed among both short- and long-term employed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>While the excess of myocardial infarction among the short-term employed may be due to tobacco and, possibly, alcohol use, it is likely that the excess noted among the long-term employed was caused by the high exposure to combustion products, particles or metals still occurring among chimney sweeps. Preventive measures to reduce hazardous occupational exposures as well as smoking and alcohol use among chimney sweeps are urgently needed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustavsson, P., Jansson, C., Hogstedt, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2013-101371</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2013-101371</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other exposures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence of myocardial infarction in Swedish chimney sweeps 1991-2005: a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>505</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>507</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/508?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cholangiocarcinoma among offset colour proof-printing workers exposed to 1,2-dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/508?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between occupational chemical exposure and incidence of cholangiocarcinoma among workers in the offset colour proof-printing section of a small printing company in Osaka, Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We identified 51 men who had worked in the proof-printing room, and 11 men who had worked in the front room for at least 1&nbsp;year between 1991 and 2006. We interviewed them about the chemicals they used, and estimated their levels of exposure to chemicals. We also investigated the medical records of 11 cholangiocarcinoma patients, and calculated the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) from 1991 to 2011.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Workers used 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) from approximately 1985 to 2006, and dichloromethane (DCM) from approximately 1985 to 1997/1998. Exposure concentrations were estimated to be 100&ndash;670&nbsp;ppm for 1,2-DCP and 80&ndash;540&nbsp;ppm for DCM among the proof-printing workers. All 11 patients were pathologically diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma. Ages at diagnosis were 25&ndash;45&nbsp;years, and ages at death were 27&ndash;46&nbsp;years among the six deceased individuals. The primary cancer site was the intrahepatic bile duct for five patients, and the extrahepatic bile ducts for six. All patients were exposed to 1,2-DCP for 7&ndash;17&nbsp;years and diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma 7&ndash;20&nbsp;years after their first exposure. Ten patients were also exposed to DCM for 1&ndash;13&nbsp;years. The SMR for cholangiocarcinoma was 2900 (expected deaths: 0.00204, 95% CI 1100 to 6400) for all workers combined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings suggest that 1,2-DCP and/or DCM may cause cholangiocarcinoma in humans.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumagai, S., Kurumatani, N., Arimoto, A., Ichihara, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101246</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101246</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cholangiocarcinoma among offset colour proof-printing workers exposed to 1,2-dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>508</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>510</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Traffic-related air pollution and prostate cancer risk: a case-control study in Montreal, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>There is a paucity of information on environmental risk factors for prostate cancer. We conducted a case&ndash;control study in Montreal to estimate associations with exposure to ground-level nitrogen dioxide (NO<SUB>2</SUB>), a marker for traffic-related air pollution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Cases were 803 men with incident prostate cancer, &le;75&nbsp;years of age, and diagnosed across all French hospitals in Montreal. Concurrently, 969 controls were drawn from electoral lists of French-speaking individuals residing in the same electoral districts as the cases and frequency-matched by age. Concentrations of NO<SUB>2</SUB> were measured across Montreal in 2005&ndash;2006. We developed a land use regression model to predict concentrations of NO<SUB>2</SUB> across Montreal for 2006. These estimates were back-extrapolated to 1996. Estimates were linked to residential addresses at the time of diagnosis or interview. Unconditional logistic regression was used, adjusting for potential confounding variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For each increase of 5 parts per billion of NO<SUB>2</SUB>, as estimated from the original land use regression model in 2006, the OR<SUB>5ppb</SUB> adjusted for personal factors was 1.44 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.73). Adding in contextual factors attenuated the OR<SUB>5ppb</SUB> to 1.27 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.58). One method for back-extrapolating concentrations of NO<SUB>2</SUB> to 1996 (about 10&nbsp;years before the index date) gave the following OR<SUB>5ppb</SUB>: 1.41 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.62) when personal factors were included, and 1.30 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.52) when contextual factors were added.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Exposure to ambient concentrations of NO<SUB>2</SUB> at the current address was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. This novel finding requires replication.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parent, M.-E., Goldberg, M. S., Crouse, D. L., Ross, N. A., Chen, H., Valois, M.-F., Liautaud, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-101211</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-101211</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Air pollution, air quality, Other exposures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Traffic-related air pollution and prostate cancer risk: a case-control study in Montreal, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Environment</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>518</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/519?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing JEMs in population-based studies: what if expert assessment and measurements are not available? Authors' response]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/519?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec> <p>We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the letter of Behrens and Taeger<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> regarding our article &lsquo;Comparison of expert and job-exposure matrix-based retrospective exposure assessment of occupational carcinogens in the Netherlands Cohort Study&rsquo;.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Behrens and Taeger raise concerns about &lsquo;validating&rsquo; existing job-exposure matrices (JEMs). Instead, they propose a recently developed web-based tool into which existing JEMs can be incorporated as job-specific modules (JSMs, a set of questions relevant to a specific job) and in which exposure estimates can be adapted according to available exposure measurements, expert opinion and study-specific circumstances.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p> <p>As cohort members in the large Netherlands Cohort Study could no longer be approached, occupational exposure assessment could only be based on the available baseline information of job titles and period of employment. To better understand the implications of using a JEM as compared with expert assessment, we compared exposure estimates based...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Offermans, N. S. M., Vermeulen, R., Burdorf, A., Peters, S., Goldbohm, R. A., Koeman, T., van Tongeren, M., Kauppinen, T., Kant, I., Kromhout, H., van den Brandt, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2013-101415</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2013-101415</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing JEMs in population-based studies: what if expert assessment and measurements are not available? Authors' response]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>519</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/519-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Single high flow exhaled nitric oxide is an imperfect proxy for distal nitric oxide]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/519-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been used as a non-invasive biomarker of airway response to inhaled toxic exposures in both population-based and occupational studies. Results have been mixed, but a compelling finding is the 60% decrease (95% CI 54&nbsp;to 66) and subsequent 130% increase (95% CI 63&nbsp;to 225) in FeNO observed in a quasi-experimental study of FeNO in a group of healthy young adult volunteers before, during and after the 2008 Beijing Olympic games air pollution control measures.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="oemed-2013-101458R1">1</cross-ref> Methodological developments now allow for the assessment of NO from proximal and distal airway compartment sources. The ability to non-invasively differentiate inflammation in two lower respiratory tract compartments may provide a practical method to gain insights into the effects of inhaled toxins. Using this approach, Sauni <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="oemed-2013-101458R2">2</cross-ref> found that occupational silica exposure was significantly associated with increased distal (ie, alveolar) NO but...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eckel, S. P., Salam, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2013-101458</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2013-101458</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Single high flow exhaled nitric oxide is an imperfect proxy for distal nitric oxide]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>519</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>520</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/520?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/520?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec id="s1">
<p>G Smailyte.Cancer incidence among workers exposed to softwood dust in Lithuania. <I>Occup Environ Med</I> 2012;<b>69</b>(6):449&ndash;451. In the Methods section, the sentence "The cohort contributed 50 444 person-years to the study (34 456 for men and 15 988 for women)" should be changed to "The cohort contributed 35 136 person-years to the study (23 793 for men and 11 343 for women)".</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2011-100253corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2011-100253corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>520</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>520</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/520-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/70/7/520-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec id="s1">
<p>A Prokopowicz, A Sobczak, M Szula <I>et al</I>. Effect of occupational lead exposure on &alpha;- and -tocopherol concentration in plasma. <I>Occup Environ Med</I> 2013;<b>70</b>(6):365&ndash;371. During the production process, all instances of &lsquo;creatinine&rsquo; were replaced by &lsquo;creatine&rsquo; which is incorrect. All instances of &lsquo;creatine&rsquo; should be replaced by &lsquo;creatinine&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-06-09T22:33:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2012-100979corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:oemed;oemed-2012-100979corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
<prism:volume>70</prism:volume>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>520</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>520</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>