Skip to main content
Log in

Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the fact that socioeconomic status (SES) has been shown to have important implications in health related issues, population-based cancer registries in the United States do not routinely collect SES information. This study presents a model to estimate the SES of cancer patients in the registry database.

Methods: At the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP), we developed a model to estimate each cancer patient's SES from aggregate measurements of the census tract of residence (n = 1,640) at time of diagnosis. We then applied the SES estimates to observe the relationship between SES and risk of cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs including cancers of the ovary, cervix uteri, and corpus uteri. The analyses were performed on the cumulative records (n = 127,819) of cancer patients diagnosed between 1972 and 1992 in Los Angeles County, California, for the mutually exclusive racial/ethnic groups of non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanic Whites, Blacks, Asians, and persons of other ethnic groups.

Results: We found SES is positively associated with female breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and cancer of the corpus uteri, but inversely associated with cervical cancer. These SES trends were quite consistent across age groups among non-Hispanic White women. Variations by race/ethnicity in the SES patterns were also found, with Asians exhibiting little association.

Conclusions: Our model of measuring SES is sufficiently sensitive to capture the trends. Adopting the aggregate approach to measure SES in population-based registry data appears to be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delzell E. Beyond social class. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blane D. Social determinants of health — socioeconomic status, social class, and ethnicity. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 903–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Link BG, Phelan JC. Understanding sociodemographic differences in health — the role of fundamental social causes. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 471–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch J. Social position and health. Ann Epidemiol 1996; 6: 21–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McWhorter WP, Schatzkin AG, Horm JW, Brown CC. Contribution of socioeconomic status to black/white differences in cancer incidence. Cancer 1989; 63: 982–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gorey KM, Vena JE. Cancer differentials among US Blacks and Whites: quantitative estimates of socioeconomic-related risks. J Natl Med Assoc 1994; 86: 209–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baquet CR, Horm JW, Gibbs T, Greenwald P. Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence among blacks and whites. J Natl Med Assoc 1991; 83: 551–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devesa SS, Diamond EL. Association of breast cancer and cervical cancer incidence with income and education among whites and blacks. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980; 65: 515–28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krieger N, Fee E. Social class: the missing link in U.S. health data. Int J Health Serv 1994; 24: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liberatos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1988; 10: 87–121.

    Google Scholar 

  11. US Bureau of the Census. Appendix A. Area Classifications. Population and Housing Characteristics for Census Tracts and Block Numbering Areas, Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA PMSA. 1990 CPH-3-215B. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wagener DK, Schatzkin A. Temporal trends in the socioeconomic gradient for breast cancer mortality among US women. Am J Public Health 1994; 4: 1003–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon NH, Crowe JP, Brumberg DJ, Berger NA. Socioeconomic factors and race in breast cancer recurrence and survival. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 609–18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ansell D, Whitman S, Lipton R, Cooper R. Race, income, and survival from breast cancer at two public hospitals. Cancer 1993; 72: 2974–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krieger N. Women and social class: a methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991; 45: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morgenstern H. Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiological research. Am J Public Health 1982; 72: 1336–44.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pukkala E, Teppo L. Socioeconomic status and education as risk determinants of gastrointestinal cancer. Prev Med 1986; 15: 127–38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mueller CW, Parcel TL. Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives and recommendations. Child Dev 1981; 52: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. US Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1996 (116th Edition). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C, eds. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Second Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller BA, Ries LAG, Hankey BF, et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review: 1973–1990. Bethesda, MD (USA): National Cancer Institute, 1993; NIH Pub. No. 93-2789.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rimpela AH, Pukkala EI. Cancer of affluence: positive social class gradient and rising incidence trend in some cancer forms. Soc Sci Med 1987; 24: 601–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams J, Clifford C, Hopper J, Giles G. Socioeconomic status and cancer mortality and incidence in Melbourne. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 917–21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hakama M, Hakulinen T, Pukkala E, Saxen E, Teppo L. Risk indicators of breast and cervical cancer on ecologic and individual levels. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 990–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Henderson BE, Pike MC, Bernstein L, Ross RK. Breast cancer. In Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Second Edition. New York, NY (USA): Oxford University Press, Inc., 1996: 1022–39.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rindfuss RR, Morgan SP, Offutt K. Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility — 1963–1989. Demography 1996; 33: 277–90.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yamaguchi K, Ferguson LR. The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors — Rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. Am Sociol Rev 1995; 60: 272–98.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luoto R, Kaprio J, Uutela A. Age at natural menopause and sociodemographic status in Finland. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139: 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stanford JL, Hartge P, Brinton LA, et al. Factors influencing the age at natural menopause. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 995–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brambilla DJ, McKinlay SM. A prospective study of factors affecting age at menopause. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 1031–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hayes CD. 1987. Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality, Pregnancy, and Childbearing. Vol. I. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Graham S, Levin M, Lilienfeld AM. The socioeconomic distribution of cancer of various sites in Buffalo, NY., 1948–52. Cancer 1960; 13: 180–91.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Doll R. The epidemiology of cancers of the breast and reproductive system. Scott Med J 1975; 20: 305–15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Williams RR, Horm JW. Association of cancer sites with tobacco and alcohol consumption and socioeconomic status of patients: interview study from the Third National Cancer Survey. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 58: 525–47.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Elwood JM, Cole P, Rothman KJ, Kaplan SD. Epidemiology of endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977; 59: 1055–60.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kelsey JL, LiVolsi VA, Holford TR, et al. A case–control study of cancer of the endometrium. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 333–42.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shapiro S, Kaufman DW, Slone D, et al. Recent and past use of conjugated estrogens in relation to adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 485–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Decarli A, Gallus G, Tognoni G. Risk factors for endometrial cancer at different ages. J Natl Cancer Inst 1984; 73: 667–71.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ewertz M, Schou G, Boice JD Jr. The joint effect of risk factors on endometrial cancer. Eur J Cancer 1988; 24: 189–94.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grady D, Ernster VL. Endometrial cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Second Edition. New York, NY (USA): Oxford University Press, Inc., 1996: 1058–89.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lesko SM, Rosenberg L, Kaufman DW, et al. Endometrium cancer and age at last delivery: evidence for an association. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 554–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Weiss NS, Szekely DR, English DR, Schweid A. I. Endometrial cancer in relation to patterns of menopausal estrogen use. JAMA 1979; 242: 261–4.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weiss NS, Cook LS, Farrow DC, Rosenblatt KA. Ovarian cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Second Edition. New York, NY (USA): Oxford University Press, Inc., 1996: 1040–57.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tavani A, Negri E, Franceschi S, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C. Risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer in women under age 45. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29: 1297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  45. La Vecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S. Education and cancer risk. Cancer 1992; 70: 2935–41.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lund E. Mortality from ovarian cancer among women with many children. Int J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 872–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Brinton LA, Hamman RF, Huggins GR, et al. Sexual and reproductive risk factors for invasive squamous cell cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1987; 79: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fasal E, Simmons ME, Kampert JB. Factors associated with high and low risk of cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1981; 66: 631–6.

    Google Scholar 

  49. West DW, Schuman KL, Lyon JL, et al. Differences in risk estimation from a hospital and a population–based case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 1984; 13: 235–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schiffman MH, Brinton LA, Devesa SS, Fraumeni JF Jr. Cervical cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Second Edition. New York, NY (USA): Oxford University Press, Inc., 1996: 1090–116.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hildesheim A, Gravitt P, Schiffman MH, et al. Determinants of genital human papillomavirus infection in low-income women in Washington, D.C. Sex Transm Dis 1993; 20: 279–85.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cramer DW. Uterine cervix. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Philadelphia, PA (USA): W.B. Saunders Company, 1982: 881–900.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Susser M, Watson W, Hopper K. Sociology in Medicine. New York, NY (USA): Oxford University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Haug MR. Measurement in social stratification. Annu Rev Sociol 1977; 3: 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bernstein L, Ross R. Cancer in Los Angeles County: A Portrait of Incidence and Mortality 1972–1987. Los Angeles, CA (USA): University of Southern California, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Miller BA, Kolonel LN, Bernstein L, et al, eds. Racial/ Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States 1988–1992. Bethesda, MD (USA): National Cancer Institute, 1996; NIH Pub. No. 96-4104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, L., Deapen, D. & Bernstein, L. Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States). Cancer Causes Control 9, 369–380 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008811432436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008811432436

Navigation