Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of cardiovascular risk profile between male employees of two automotive companies in France and Sweden

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine whether or not the lower rate of coronary disease in France, in comparison with Sweden, might be explained by different cardiovascular risk profiles, a cross-sectional analysis (first step of a longitudinal study) of comparable samples of automotive workers was carried out in corporate occupational health clinics of Renault and Volvo. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated and the Framingham coronary risk was estimated for 1000 randomly selected 45–50 years old Caucasian males from each company. Compared with the Frenchmen, the Swedish men consisted of more white collar workers and were slightly older. After adjustment for age and blue/white collar status, the Swedish men showed lower body mass indexes, waist to hip rations and heart rates, lower frequency of treatment of hypercholesterolemia and diabetes than the Frenchmen. The Swedish males also exhibited higher averages of blood cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and glucose, but lower frequencies of hypercholestrolemia and diabetes, and a higher frequency of family histories of cardiovascular disease. Blood pressure, hypertension prevalence, triglycerides level, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) did not differ between the groups. The average number of traditional risk factors was 1.1/person for the Frenchmen and 0.8/person for the Swedes. However, the coronary risk as estimated using the Framingham index was not different between the groups. This, together with the more frequent family history of cardiovascular disease in Swedish men, suggests a lower susceptibility to risk factors as a possible explanation for the lower cardiovascular disease prevalence reported in France, and/or the possibility that factors not measured were involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Who MONICA project. Prepared by Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amoyel P. Arveiler D, Rajakangos AM, Pajak A. Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the who-Monica project. Registration procedures, event rates and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in 4 continents. Circulation 1991; 90: 583–612.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tuntall-Pedoe H. Autres pays, autres moeurs. Theories on why the French have less heart disease than the British. Br Med 1988; 297: 1559–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kannel WB, McGee D, Gordon T. A general cardiovascular risk profile: The Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonithon-Kopp C, Levenson T, Scarabin PY, Guillaneuf MT, Kirzin JM, Malmejac A, et al. Longitudinal associations between plasma viscosity and cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged French population. Atherosclerosis 1993; 104: 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hautanen A, Manttari M, Manninen V, Tenkanen L, Huttunen JK, Frick MK, et al. Adrenal androgens and testosterone as coronary risk factors in the Helsinki Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 1994; 105: 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cambillau M, Simon A, Amar J, Giral P, Atger V, Segond P, et al. Serum Lp(a) as a discriminant marker of early atherosclerotic plaque at three extracoronary sites in hypercholesterolemic men. Artherioscler Thromb 1992; 12: 1346–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Renaud S, De Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet 1992; 339: 1523–1526.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pekkanen J, Tuomilehto, Utela A, et al. Social class, health behaviour and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland. Br Med J 1995; 311: 589–593.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karasek R, Theorell T, Schwartz JE. Job characteristics in relation to the prevalence of myocardial infarction in the US Health Examination Survey (HES) and the Health and Nutrition Examination Study (HANES), Am J Publ Health 1998; 78: 904–909.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon A, Levenson J. Could the identification of subclinical atherosclerosis offer an alternative to the mass drug treatment of hypercholesterolemia? Atherosclerosis 1994; 105: 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypternsion. Ann Int Med 1991; 114: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, Odell PM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile: A statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991; 83: 356–362.

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization: Measuring obesity-classiciation and description of anthopometric data. Report on a WHO consultation of the epidemiology of obesity, Warsaw 21–23 October, 1987, Copenhagen: WHO, 1989 (Nutrition Unit document, EUR/ICP/NUT 125).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Björntorp P. Classification of obese patients and complications related to the distribution of surplus fat. Am J Clin Nutr 1987; 45: 1120–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simon A, Giral P, Levenson J. Extracoronary atherosclerotic plaque at multiple sites and total coronary calcification deposit in asymptomatic men. Association with coronary risk profile. Circulation 1995; 92: 1414–1421.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ellefson RD, Caraway WT. Fundamentals of clinical chemistry. Tietz NW (ed), Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1982: 509–510.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seigler L, Wu WT. Separation of serum high-density lipoprotein for cholesterol determination. Ultracentrifugation vs precipitation with sodium phosphamythrate and magnesium chloride. Clin Chem 1981; 27: 838–841.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heat 1949; 37: 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mantel N. Chi Square test with one degree of freedom. Extension of the Mantel-Haentszel procedure. J Am Stat Ass 1963; 59: 690–697.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laurier D, Chau NP, Cazelles B, Segond P, the PCV METRA Group. Estimation of CHD risk in a French working population using a modified Framingham model. J Clinic Epidemiol 1994; 47: 1353–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kannel WB, Kannel C, Paffenberger RS, Cupples LA. Heart rate and cardiovascular mortality: The Framingham Study. Am Heart 1987; 113: 1489–1494.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simon, A., Dimberg, L., Levenson, J. et al. Comparison of cardiovascular risk profile between male employees of two automotive companies in France and Sweden. Eur J Epidemiol 13, 885–891 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007428624757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007428624757

Navigation