Abstract
To determine whether or not the lower rate of coronary disease in France, in comparison with Sweden, might be explained by different cardiovascular risk profiles, a cross-sectional analysis (first step of a longitudinal study) of comparable samples of automotive workers was carried out in corporate occupational health clinics of Renault and Volvo. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were evaluated and the Framingham coronary risk was estimated for 1000 randomly selected 45–50 years old Caucasian males from each company. Compared with the Frenchmen, the Swedish men consisted of more white collar workers and were slightly older. After adjustment for age and blue/white collar status, the Swedish men showed lower body mass indexes, waist to hip rations and heart rates, lower frequency of treatment of hypercholesterolemia and diabetes than the Frenchmen. The Swedish males also exhibited higher averages of blood cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and glucose, but lower frequencies of hypercholestrolemia and diabetes, and a higher frequency of family histories of cardiovascular disease. Blood pressure, hypertension prevalence, triglycerides level, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) did not differ between the groups. The average number of traditional risk factors was 1.1/person for the Frenchmen and 0.8/person for the Swedes. However, the coronary risk as estimated using the Framingham index was not different between the groups. This, together with the more frequent family history of cardiovascular disease in Swedish men, suggests a lower susceptibility to risk factors as a possible explanation for the lower cardiovascular disease prevalence reported in France, and/or the possibility that factors not measured were involved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Who MONICA project. Prepared by Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amoyel P. Arveiler D, Rajakangos AM, Pajak A. Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the who-Monica project. Registration procedures, event rates and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in 4 continents. Circulation 1991; 90: 583–612.
Tuntall-Pedoe H. Autres pays, autres moeurs. Theories on why the French have less heart disease than the British. Br Med 1988; 297: 1559–1560.
Kannel WB, McGee D, Gordon T. A general cardiovascular risk profile: The Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 46–56.
Bonithon-Kopp C, Levenson T, Scarabin PY, Guillaneuf MT, Kirzin JM, Malmejac A, et al. Longitudinal associations between plasma viscosity and cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged French population. Atherosclerosis 1993; 104: 173–182.
Hautanen A, Manttari M, Manninen V, Tenkanen L, Huttunen JK, Frick MK, et al. Adrenal androgens and testosterone as coronary risk factors in the Helsinki Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 1994; 105: 191–200.
Cambillau M, Simon A, Amar J, Giral P, Atger V, Segond P, et al. Serum Lp(a) as a discriminant marker of early atherosclerotic plaque at three extracoronary sites in hypercholesterolemic men. Artherioscler Thromb 1992; 12: 1346–1352.
Renaud S, De Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet 1992; 339: 1523–1526.
Pekkanen J, Tuomilehto, Utela A, et al. Social class, health behaviour and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland. Br Med J 1995; 311: 589–593.
Karasek R, Theorell T, Schwartz JE. Job characteristics in relation to the prevalence of myocardial infarction in the US Health Examination Survey (HES) and the Health and Nutrition Examination Study (HANES), Am J Publ Health 1998; 78: 904–909.
Simon A, Levenson J. Could the identification of subclinical atherosclerosis offer an alternative to the mass drug treatment of hypercholesterolemia? Atherosclerosis 1994; 105: 245–249.
Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypternsion. Ann Int Med 1991; 114: 345–352.
Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, Odell PM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile: A statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991; 83: 356–362.
World Health Organization: Measuring obesity-classiciation and description of anthopometric data. Report on a WHO consultation of the epidemiology of obesity, Warsaw 21–23 October, 1987, Copenhagen: WHO, 1989 (Nutrition Unit document, EUR/ICP/NUT 125).
Björntorp P. Classification of obese patients and complications related to the distribution of surplus fat. Am J Clin Nutr 1987; 45: 1120–1125.
Simon A, Giral P, Levenson J. Extracoronary atherosclerotic plaque at multiple sites and total coronary calcification deposit in asymptomatic men. Association with coronary risk profile. Circulation 1995; 92: 1414–1421.
Ellefson RD, Caraway WT. Fundamentals of clinical chemistry. Tietz NW (ed), Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1982: 509–510.
Seigler L, Wu WT. Separation of serum high-density lipoprotein for cholesterol determination. Ultracentrifugation vs precipitation with sodium phosphamythrate and magnesium chloride. Clin Chem 1981; 27: 838–841.
Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heat 1949; 37: 161–168.
Mantel N. Chi Square test with one degree of freedom. Extension of the Mantel-Haentszel procedure. J Am Stat Ass 1963; 59: 690–697.
Laurier D, Chau NP, Cazelles B, Segond P, the PCV METRA Group. Estimation of CHD risk in a French working population using a modified Framingham model. J Clinic Epidemiol 1994; 47: 1353–1364.
Kannel WB, Kannel C, Paffenberger RS, Cupples LA. Heart rate and cardiovascular mortality: The Framingham Study. Am Heart 1987; 113: 1489–1494.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simon, A., Dimberg, L., Levenson, J. et al. Comparison of cardiovascular risk profile between male employees of two automotive companies in France and Sweden. Eur J Epidemiol 13, 885–891 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007428624757
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007428624757