Original article
Fragrance contact dermatitis: A worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I)

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1046-199X(96)90078-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of responses to selected fragrance materials in patients with suspect fragrance allergy and to evaluate risk factors and associations with such responses. The validity of using specific fragrance ingredients versus a mixture of fragrances was evaluated in terms of predicting allergy to different fragrance ingredients.

Methods: One hundred sixty-seven subjects were evaluated in seven centers worldwide with a fragrance mix, the eight ingredients in the fragrance mixture, six other well-known fragrance allergens, balsam of Peru, and 15 lesser studied fragrance materials.

Results: The age of the patients was 44.9 ± 17.5 years (mean ± SD). More than 85% were women. A relatively high proportion gave a past history of atopic disease. Facial eruptions (40%) and hand involvement (26.7%) were the most common topographic sites. All but 4 of the 35 fragrance materials produced a positive response in > 1%. A reaction to fragrance mix occurred in 47.3%. Seven of the 34 ingredients tested produced an allergic response in more than 10% of those tested. Men were more likely than women to exhibit a positive response to five fragrance ingredients. White persons were more likely to react to perfume mix (52.8% versus 25.3%) and certain ingredients in the mix than Asian persons. Allergy to benzyl salicylate was more common in Japan than in Europe or the United States.

Conclusion: The age at which patients with perfume allergy present for evaluation is similar to that of other contactants. Atopic individuals may be overrepresented in this group of patients. Face involvement is likely. White persons are more likely to react to fragrance mix, whereas in Asian patients benzyl salicylate was a more frequent allergen. Fragrance mix coreacted with 85.6% of positive responses to fragrance ingredients. The addition of ylang ylang oil, narcissus oil, and sandalwood oil to fragrance mix would be expected to pick up 94.2% with positive responses to fragrance materials; adding balsam of Peru increases this to 96%.

References (32)

  • W Larsen

    Perfume dermatitis

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1985)
  • K Kohrman et al.

    Benzyl salicylate: A survey of consumer patch-test sensitization

    Food Chem Toxicol

    (1983)
  • B Meding

    Epidemiology of hand eczema in an industrial city

    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh)

    (1990)
  • C Goh

    An epidemiological comparison between hand eczema and non-hand eczema

    Br J Dermatol

    (1988)
  • W Fann et al.

    Study on Chinese common allergens of contact dermatitis

    Derm Beruf Umwelt

    (1990)
  • T Lee et al.

    Patch testing in Hong Kong

    Contact Dermatitis

    (1989)
  • N Veien et al.

    Patch testing with perfume mixture

    Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh)

    (1982)
  • T Fischer et al.

    Finn chamber patch test technique

    Contact Dermatitis

    (1984)
  • F Enders et al.

    Epicutaneous testing with a standard series

  • A Piriou-Robaglia et al.

    Dermatitis from contact with perfume

    Allerg Immunol (Paris)

    (1990)
  • J Nethercott et al.

    Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1985 through 1989. I: Frequency of response

    Am J Contact Dermatitis

    (1991)
  • M Hannuksela

    Epicutaneous testing

    Ann Allergy

    (1979)
  • J Nethercott

    Sensitivity and specificity of patch tests

    Am J Contact Dermatitis

    (1994)
  • E Epstein et al.

    Recent experiences with routine patch test screening

    Arch Dermatol

    (1968)
  • N Kanof

    The American Academy of Dermatology patch test series for contact dermatitis

    Int J Dermatol

    (1977)
  • E Panconesi et al.

    Computer data on patch tests of 688 eczema patients

    Contact Dermatitis

    (1975)
  • Cited by (131)

    • Contact dermatitis

      2023, Personal Care Products and Human Health
    • RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 6,7-dihydro-1,1,2,3,3-pentamethyl-4(5H)-indanone, CAS Registry Number 33704-61-9

      2021, Food and Chemical Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Section X provides the maximum acceptable concentrations in finished products, which take into account skin sensitization and application of the Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA2) described by Api et al. (RIFM, 2008; IDEA [International Dialogue for the Evaluation of Allergens] project Final Report on the QRA2: Skin Sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment for Fragrance Ingredients, September 30, 2016, https://ideaproject.info/documents/QRA2-report.pdf) and a reference dose of 0.1 mg/kg/day. Additional References: Larsen, 1996; RIFM, 1981a; RIFM, 1981b; RIFM, 2017; IFRA, 2015b. Literature Search and Risk Assessment Completed On: 08/18/20.

    • Allergic contact dermatitis Patient management and education

      2016, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Chemicals that can be used to help detect fragrance allergy include cinnamic aldehyde (on the North American Contact Dermatitis Group [NACDG] standard but not on the Thin-layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous [T.R.U.E.] Test [SmartPractice, Phoenix, AZ]), fragrance mix I (a NACDG standard and T.R.U.E. Test allergen), fragrance mix II (on the NACDG standard but not on the T.R.U.E. Test), and Myroxylon pereirae (a NACDG standard and T.R.U.E. Test allergen). One study found that patients who were allergic to fragrance mix I had coreactions to various other fragrance chemicals not present in the mix.8 Allergy to fragrance mix I was detected in 8.5% of the approximately 4300 patients with dermatitis who were tested by the NACDG.9

    • Contact Dermatitis: A Practice Parameter-Update 2015

      2015, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
    • Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances: Part 2

      2013, Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Japan Allergy Foundation.

    View full text