Elsevier

Safety Science

Volume 24, Issue 1, October 1996, Pages 61-73
Safety Science

The effects of feedback and goal setting on safety performance at two construction sites

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(96)00070-7Get rights and content

Abstract

An internal safety inspection has to be carried out weekly on building construction sites in Finland. This procedure is widely believed to be ineffective, as illustrated by the high accident rates in the building industry. In this study, a new method for weekly inspections, based on participation and the principles of performance management, was tested at two construction sites. Eight safety rules were formulated together with the safety personnel of the company. Once a week the supervisor and the workers' safety delegate observed the safety level, using a standard observation method. After baseline observations, an information meeting was organized for all workers, and thereafter the safety index of each weekly observation round was marked on a large graph on the wall of the dining room. The safety index rose from the baseline of 60% to 89% during the feedback at Site 1. At Site 2 the index rose from 67% to 91%. The stage of the construction process had no significant effect on the results; the index level of 90% was achieved at all stages of the process. The most visible change was an improvement in order and tidiness. The subindexes concerning protection against falling, machine safety, scaffoldings and use of personal protective devices improved to nearly 100%, which should prevent severe injuries in particular. The new audit method with weekly graphic feedback could well be a method for the construction industry to reach a radically higher safety level.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Voicing for safety in the workplace: A proactive goal-regulation perspective

    2020, Safety Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Empirical studies show that organisations that clearly communicate safety goals achieve significantly better safety performance and compliance with rules and procedures, reduction of risk-conditions, inappropriate behaviours and accidents and injuries over time (Boyce and Geller, 2001; Cooper et al., 1994; Fellner and Sulzer-Azaroff, 1985). Although goal-setting intervention strategies lead to better safety outcomes, most research has traditionally focused on prescribed goals identified by management to improve safety compliance oriented behaviours (Bumstead, and Boyce, 2005; Cooper, 2006; Laitinen, and Ruohomäki, 1996; Ludwig and Geller, 2000; Marsh et al., 1995; Sulzer-Azaroff et al., 1990). These goals tend to focus on compliance with procedures and standards, rather than on the anticipation of future safety risks.

  • Achieving sustainability in the construction supervision process

    2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
  • A system dynamics view of a behavior-based safety program in the construction industry

    2018, Safety Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Results suggested that BBS was effective to reduce accident rate and severity. Laitinen and Ruohomäki (1996) found that feedback and goal setting had positive effects on safety performance at two construction sites in Finland. Similarly, Duff et al. (1994) implemented and tested feedback and goal setting methods at six construction sites in the UK.

  • Structural equation model of integrated safety intervention practices affecting the safety behaviour of workers in the construction industry

    2017, Safety Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Safety information and feedback are required in safety management at the workplace, and they have a positive impact on safety performance. As Laitinen and Ruohomäki (1996) shows, the safety index is significantly higher when feedback is given after goals are issued compared to when no feedback is given. Mohamed (2002) states that safety management audits assist a company in focusing on target responsibility on safety.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text