Contribution of indoor and outdoor environments to PM2.5 personal exposure of children—VESTA study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00136-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Several studies among adult populations showed that an array of outdoor and indoor sources of particles emissions contributed to personal exposures to atmospheric particles, with tobacco smoke playing a prominent role (J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 6 (1996) 57, Environ. Int. 24 (1998) 405, Arch. Environ. Health 54 (1999) 95). The Vesta study was carried out to assess the role of exposure to traffic emissions in the development of childhood asthma. In this paper, we present data on 68 children aged 8–14 years, living in the metropolitan areas of Paris (n=30), Grenoble (n=15) and Toulouse (n=23), France, who continuously carried, over 48 h, a rucksack that contained an active PM2.5 sampler. Data about home indoor sources were collected by questionnaires. In parallel, daily concentrations of PM10 in ambient air were monitored by local air quality networks. The contribution of indoor and outdoor factors to personal exposures was assessed using multiple linear regression models. Average personal exposure across all children was 23.7 μg/m3 (S.D.=19.0 μg/m3), with local means ranging from 18.2 to 29.4 μg/m3. The final model explains 36% of the total between-subjects variance, with environmental tobacco smoke contributing for more than a third to this variability; presence of pets at home, proximity of the home to urban traffic emissions, and concomitant PM10 ambient air concentrations were the other main determinants of personal exposure.

Introduction

Sources of atmospheric particles are classified as outdoor environmental sources, e.g. traffic exhausts, industrial combustion processes or erosion, and indoor sources, such as tobacco smoke, indoor combustion processes (e.g. for heating or cooking), pets or human activity at home (Marge et al., 1999). The poor correlations often observed between personal exposures measured on a short time scale, and ambient air concentrations measured during the same period (Lioy et al., 1990, Monn et al., 1997, Boudet et al., 2000), suggest that a host of factors other than ambient air may contribute to personal exposures. Since people spend approximately 80% of their time in indoor environments, in western life-style areas, indoor concentrations might represent an important determinant of personal exposure. The influence of outdoor sources also depends upon the characteristics of indoor ventilation and upon the structure of the buildings, both being important determinants of the air exchange rate (Rojas-Bracho et al., 2000). The penetration factor from outdoor to indoor environment for fines particles has been estimated between 0.7 and 1 (Oglesby et al., 2000). While there are many papers describing the contribution of different indoor and outdoor particles sources on personal exposure of adults (Ozkaynak et al., 1996, Janssen et al., 1998, Ebelt et al., 2000), personal exposure studies on children are scarce (Mosqueron et al., 2001).

The aim of this study, which is part of a research program on the role of air pollution on the occurrence of childhood asthma (the VESTA study), is to assess the main factors that influence personal exposure to fines particles (PM2.5) of children in French urban environments.

Section snippets

Study population and PM2.5 personal exposure measurements

In the VESTA study, 434 children, 4–14 years of age, were included in five French cities (Grenoble, Paris, Toulouse, Clermont-Ferrand and Nice), between March 1998 and December 2000. The design of this study is detailed elsewhere (Zmirou et al., in press). This paper deals with a fraction of this study population, who could participate to the PM2.5 personal exposure measurements. Briefly, children between 8 and 14, who were all volunteers (n=68), carried during 48 h an active sampler (SKC pump,

Results

Fig. 1 and Table 1 summarises the characteristics of the study population, by city. Average values of 48-h PM2.5 personal exposures (P=0.008), of background PM10 ambient air concentrations (P=0.05), of the index of traffic exposure (P<10−3), as well as of the number of persons/room (P<10−3) differ according to the city. By contrast, no difference was observed according to the city for the number of cigarettes smoked by the mother during the 48 h of measurements (P=0.48), and for the percentage

Discussion

In this study conducted in three French metropolitan areas, 36% of the variance of children PM2.5 personal exposure is explained, on the one hand, by indoor factors such as maternal tobacco smoke (36.1% of the total between-subjects variability) and presence of rodents at home (20.5%), and on the other hand by outdoor factors such as background PM10 ambient concentrations (23.6%) and, to a lesser degree, the proximity to traffic exhausts (12.2%).

These results are in agreement with other

Conclusion

This study evaluates the contribution of indoor and outdoor factors on exposure of children to air particles, and confirms that short-term personal exposures are not closely related to ambient air concentrations, as already demonstrated for adults. It does not result that ambient air surveillance data should not be used to assess population exposures. Merely, it shows that, while these surveillance data are easier to get in routine, characteristics of personal and population activities, and

Acknowledgements

This program was supported by the French Research Program on air pollution (Primequal-Predit). Stephanie Gauvin received a doctoral grant by ADEME (French Environment and Energy Agency) and Union Française des Industries Pétrolières (UFIP). The authors thank the heads of the air quality monitoring networks of the three cities (ASCOPARG: MB Personnaz, ORAMIP: M. Della Massa, AIRPARIF: Ph Lameloise) for their collaboration, as well as Météo France.

References (24)

  • P.J. Lioy et al.

    The personal, indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM-10 measured in an industrial community during the winter

    Atmos. Environ.

    (1990)
  • C. Monn et al.

    Particulate matter less than 10 μm (PM210) and fine particles less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5): relationships between indoor, outdoor and personal concentrations

    Sci. Tot. Environ.

    (1997)
  • C. Boudet et al.

    Fraction of PM2.5 personal exposure attributable to urban traffic: a modeling approach

    Inhal. Toxicol.

    (2000)
  • C. Boudet et al.

    Total personal exposure to fine particulate matter in a urban adult population: the role of ambient air and transport

    Int. J. Veh. Design

    (1998)
  • D.J. Briggs et al.

    Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach

    Int. J. Geographical Information Sci.

    (1997)
  • P. Carrer et al.

    Daily personal exposure to air pollutants of office workers in Milano

    Proc. Healthy Buildings/IAQ

    (1997)
  • D.W. Dockery et al.

    Indoor–outdoor relationship of respirable sulfates and particles

    Atmos. Environ.

    (1980)
  • S. Ebelt et al.

    Exposure of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients to particulate matter: relationship between personal and ambient air concentrations

    J. Air Waste Manage.

    (2000)
  • S. Echols et al.

    Temporal variability of microenvironmental time budgets in Maryland

    J. Expo. Analy. Environ. Epidemiol.

    (1999)
  • S. Gauvin et al.

    Road traffic, NO2 exposure and respiratory function among children (VESTA study)

    Int. J. Vehicle Design

    (2001)
  • M. Jantunen et al.

    Air pollution exposure in European cities: the ‘Expolis’ study

    J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol.

    (1998)
  • N.A. Janssen et al.

    Personal sampling of PM10 in adults: relation between personal, indoor and outdoor concentrations

    Am. J. Epidemiol.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Maternal NO<inf>2</inf> exposure disturbs the long noncoding RNA expression profile in the lungs of offspring in time-series patterns

      2022, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies of air pollution effects during pregnancy generally consider exposure in the outdoor air. However, personal exposures are also greatly influenced by air pollutant in indoor environments, where people spend about 80% of their time (Gauvin et al., 2002; Hu and Zhao, 2021). NO2 is a common indoor air pollutant that can penetrate more deeply into the lungs and initiate respiratory diseases (Samoli et al., 2006; Tao et al., 2012).

    • Comparing human exposure to fine particulate matter in low and high-income countries: A systematic review of studies measuring personal PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is important to note that the identification of sources in the reviewed studies was largely observational or tested when comparing different groups (i.e. changing from biomass to LPG stoves or comparing smokers and non-smokers). Only a small proportion of studies quantified the contribution of these sources to daily PM2.5 exposure measuring the chemical elements of PM2.5 and utilising positive matrix factorisation (Larson et al., 2004; Shang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2015) or employing linear regression methods (Brown et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2018; Cortez-Lugo et al., 2015; Gauvin et al., 2002; Jedrychowski et al., 2006; Mehta et al., 2014; Mohammadyan, 2011; Mosqueron et al., 2002; Sanchez et al., 2020; Sinaga et al., 2020; Van Ryswyk et al., 2014). The variety of PM2.5 sources emphasises that a one size fits all approach to reduce exposure in countries is unlikely to be effective, highlighting the importance of conducting local personal exposure studies.

    • Predicting gestational personal exposure to PM<inf>2.5</inf> from satellite-driven ambient concentrations in Shanghai

      2019, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although indoor sampling to measure personal exposure has a lower risk of misclassification, its high cost has limited the possibility of applying such methods in large cohort studies especially when evaluating the chronic health impact of PM2.5 (Carvalho et al., 2016; Mila et al., 2018). The sampling and modeling approaches of indoor air pollution exposure are not mutually exclusive as some previous studies utilized personal sampling data to study the determinants affecting the relationship between personal exposure and ambient air quality (Arku et al., 2015; Gauvin et al., 2002). Results showed that both the individual time-activity patterns and variance of PM2.5 in different micro-environments can be used as predictors of personal exposure.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: CSTB, Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, Paris.

    2

    Present address: Nancy University Medical School.

    View full text