Biological monitoring and standard setting in the USA: a critical appraisal

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(95)03288-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Occupational exposure limits (OELs) issued in the US by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) require measurements of toxic substances in air rather than in biological samples. Most of OSHA's limits were adopted from the 1968 list of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs). Although there are no formal requirements to monitor exposures to these substances, it is implicit in the standards that air sampling will be performed. Of the 13 OELs which OSHA has set de novo, 2 (i.e., those for lead and cadmium) require biomonitoring after air sampling has identified the heavily exposed workers. OSHA appears to value biomonitoring in some circumstances but has apparently not found a consistent rationale for using biomarkers to set and enforce its standards. This paper discusses 2 valuable features of biomarkers which should be exploited by OSHA to further its regulatory agenda. The first relates to controversies associated with dose rate which have come into play in setting short-term exposure limits (STELs) when acute effects do not provide the necessary justification. OSHA has not provided evidence that its STELs are needed to reduce the risks of disease (as in the cases of benzene and ethylene oxide). By investigating the exposure-biomarker relationship, it is possible to determine whether the rate of exposure has any influence on the uptake and elimination of toxic substances and, therefore, whether STELs is needed. This is illustrated with data from 2 studies on styrene exposure. The second feature concerns biomonitoring as the primary means of exposure assessment in situations where the biomarker is accumulated over months or years (as in the cases of lead and cadmium). Using data from the lead-battery industry, it is shown that ‘correct’ compliance decisions are more likely to arise from evaluation of blood lead measurements than from traditional air monitoring.

References (31)

  • D. Paxman et al.

    Analysis of OSHA's short-tenn-exposure limit for benzene

    Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (1990)
  • J.W. Yager et al.

    Sister-chromatid exchange in lymphocytes are increased in relation to longitudinally measured occupational exposure to low concentrations of styrene

    Mutat. Res.

    (1993)
  • S.M. Rappaport

    Threshold Limit Values, Permissible Exposure Limits and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States

    Am. J. Ind. Med.

    (1993)
  • AFL-CIO v. OSHA, Federal Court of Appeals 11, No. 89-7185, petition filed...
  • OSHA

    Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry. 29 CFR Part 1910, subpart Z — Toxic and hazardous substances, section 1910.1000 — Air contaminants

    (1993)
  • OSHA

    29 CFR Part 1910, Air contaminants, final rule

    Fed. Regul.

    (1989)
  • ACGIH

    Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for 1987–1988

    (1987)
  • ACGIH

    Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for 1993–1994

    (1993)
  • OSHA

    Occupational exposure to lead

    Fed. Regul.

    (1978)
  • OSHA

    Occupational exposure to cadmium, final rule

    Fed. Regul.

    (1992)
  • OSHA

    Occupational exposure to benzene, final rule

    Fed. Regul.

    (1987)
  • OSHA

    Occupational exposure to ethylene oxide, final rule

    Fed. Regul.

    (1984)
  • OSHA

    Occupational exposure to formaldehyde, final rule

    Fed. Regul.

    (1987)
  • OSHA

    Occupational exposure to inorganic arsenic, supplemental statement of reasons for the final rule

    Fed. Regul.

    (1983)
  • OSHA

    OSHA preamble and final rules for asbestos exposure in general industry and construction (revised) and shipyard employment (new)

    Fed. Regul.

    (1986)
  • Cited by (7)

    • The use of biomarkers in occupational health research, practice, and policy

      2012, Toxicology Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Historically, stressors most notably, chemical substances have been assessed in the ambient environment, the space between the source and the worker. This is the province of exposure science, and it has advanced considerably in the last 50 years (Rappaport, 1995). The ability to measure xenobiotics in biological specimens collected from workers enables the determination of exposure within the worker rather than can be measured in the adjacent environment.

    • Air samples versus biomarkers for epidemiology

      2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine
    • Occupational epidemiologic study design and application

      1996, Occupational Medicine - State of the Art Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text