The effect of major railway accidents on the psychological health of train drivers—I. Acute psychological responses to accident
References (39)
Dimensions of life events that influence psychological distress; an evaluation and synthesis of the literature
- et al.
The effect of major railway accidents on the psychological health of train drivers. II: A longitudinal study of the one-year outcome after the accident
J Psychosom Res
(1993) Somatic and psychological symptoms after the experience of life threatening events: a profile analysis
Victimology
(1985)The long-term psychiatric consequences of accidental injury. A longitudinal study of 107 adults
Br J Psychiatry
(1988)- et al.
Investigations on the mortality and morbidity of Norwegian ex-concentration camp prisoners
Isr J Psychiat Rel Scien
(1981) The stressors and the post-traumatic stress syndrome after an industrial disaster
Acta Psychiatr Scand
(1989)When Disaster Strikes
(1986)Acute response to rape—a PTSD variant
Acta Psychiatr Scand
(1989)A longitudinal study of the occurrence and persistence of post-traumatic health problems in disaster survivors
Stress Med
(1991)- et al.
Traumatic experiences in psychiatric outpatients
J Traumatic Stress
(1990)
Trauma and anxiety: The cognitive approach
J. Traumatic Stress
Post-traumatic Neurosis
The stress upon rescuers involved in an oil rig disaster. “Alexander L Kielland” 1980
Acta Psychiatr Scand
Importance of high response rates in traumatic stress research
Acta Psychiatr Scand
Stress response syndromes and their treatment
Post-traumatic stress disorder and civil violence in Northern Ireland
Br J Psychiatry
Life Events and Illness
Relationship between psychiatric impairment and a natural disaster: the role of distress
Psychol Med
Psychological reactions to violence in working life: Bank robberies
Cited by (49)
Posttraumatic stress disorder after minor trauma – A prospective cohort study
2020, Medical HypothesesCitation Excerpt :The symptoms have to last longer than one month, cause significant functional impairment and develop within the first 6 months after trauma [2]. Many studies investigated possible influencing factors for developing a PTSD [3–7]. The results showed that injury severity is not a good predictor of psychosocial outcome, whereas the subjective impact of trauma is much more important in this context [7].
Course and predictors of posttraumatic stress among male train drivers after the experience of 'person under the train' incidents
2012, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :A frequency rate of such symptoms of up to 88% has been reported, when acute psychological responses after the traumatic event were included [1,8,9]. Studies further demonstrated high overall distress [10], and particularly sleep problems as a frequent stress response [1,7,11,12], as well as long absence time from work [11,12]. In cross-sectional studies, the presence of PTSD and posttraumatic stress symptoms in train drivers after ‘person under the train’ incidents was associated with a variety of other adverse health outcomes [6,12,13].
Comparing combinations of EEG activity in train drivers during monotonous driving
2011, Expert Systems with ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :Therefore, equation (θ + α)/β could be a promising algorithm for fatigue detection, since it provides a measure for greater magnitude of changes in brain activity throughout driving. Consequences of a train accident can be devastating for both the victims and the surrounding communities (Chung, Easthope, Farmer, Werrett, & Chung, 2003; Chung, Farmer, Werrett, Easthope, & Chung, 2001; Hagström, 1995; Malt et al., 1993). Almost 75% of train accidents are caused by human errors, and most of these errors are caused by fatigued train crew members (Edkins & Pollock, 1997; Wilde & Stinson, 1983).
A prospective study of the psychological effects of "person under train" incidents on drivers
2006, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchPsychological stress reactions of women in Sweden who have been assaulted: Acute response and four-month follow-up
2006, Nursing OutlookCitation Excerpt :The IES includes 4 options for each item (0 = not at all, 1 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 5 = often). A subscale score of 0–8 indicates minor reactions, 9–19 indicates moderate reactions, and a score of ≥ 20 signifies reactions of clinical importance.36 The Cronbach’s α for the current sample was .88 and .92 for intrusive thoughts and .78 and .82 for avoidance.
Symptoms of PTSD according to individual and work environment characteristics of Korean railroad drivers with experience of person-under-train accidents
2006, Journal of Psychosomatic Research