Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational exposure and lung cancer risk in a coastal area of Northeastern Italy

  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A case-control study of lung cancer and occupational exposure was conducted in a coastal area of Northeastern Italy where metallurgical and mechanical industries, docks and shipyards are located. Cases comprised 756 men who died of primary lung cancer in a 5-year period. Controls comprised 756 male subjects dying from other causes during the same period. Occupational exposures to lung carcinogens were assessed according to a job title-based approach, using two separate lists of industries/occupations recognized as being causally associated (list A) or suspected of being causally associated (list B) with lung cancer in humans. Exposure to asbestos was classified as absent, possible, or definite. After adjustment for cigarette smoking and place of residence, a significant association was found between lung cancer and occupations in both list A [relative risk (RR) = 2.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.68–3.03] and list B (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.03–1.71). A significant excess risk was found for workers with definite exposure to asbestos as compared to those with no exposure to lung carcinogens (RR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.42–2.75). Among occupations with recognized exposure to lung carcinogens other than asbestos, a significant excess risk for lung cancer was observed in iron and metalware workers. In occupational groups with definite exposure to asbestos, elevated risk estimates were found for shipyard workers, dockworkers, carpenters, and electricians. The combined effect of smoking and asbestos was found to be compatible with that expected under a multiplicative model. The overall population-attributable risk (ARp) for cigarette smoking was found to be 87.5%. The ARp estimate for occupations in list A was 16.0%. The estimate increased to 25.3% (95% CI = 16.2–34.4) when occupations in list B were included. The ARp estimate for possible or definite exposure to asbestos was 20.0% (95% CI = 11.5–28.5). With regard to the histologic types of lung cancer, significant associations were found between definite exposure to asbestos and squamous cell carcinoma (RR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.28-–3.11), small cell carcinoma (RR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.31–3.39), and adenocarcinoma (RR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.32–3.53).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auerbach O, Garfinkel L, Parks VR, Conston AS, Galdi VA, Joubert L (1984) Histologic type of lung cancer and asbestos exposure. Cancer 54:3017–3021

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blot WJ, Morris Brown L, Pottern LM, Stone BJ, Fraumeni JF (1983) Lung cancer among long-term steel workers. Am J Epidemiol 117:706–716

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research, vol 1 (The analysis of case-control studies). International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC scientific publication; no 32), Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calle EE (1984) Criteria for selection of decedent versus living controls in a mortality case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 120:635–642

    Google Scholar 

  5. Churg A (1985) Lung cancer cell type and asbestos exposure. JAMA 253:2984–2985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Damber LA, Larsson LG (1986) Smoking and lung cancer with special regard to type of smoking and type of cancer. A case-control study in north Sweden. Br J Cancer 53:673–681

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon WJ, Brown MB, Engelman L, Jennrich RI (1990) BMDP statistical software manual, vol 2. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doll R, Peto J (1981) The causes of cancer. Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kjuus H, Skjærven R, Langard S, Lien JT, Aamodt T (1986) A case-referent study of lung cancer, occupational exposures and smoking. II. Role of asbestos exposure. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kjuus H, Skjæven R, Langård S, Lien JT, Aamodt T (1986) A case-referent study of lung cancer, occupational exposures and smoking. III. Etiologic fraction of occupational exposures. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolonel LN, Hirohata T, Nomura A (1977) Adequacy of survey data collected from substitute respondents. Am J Epidemiol 106:476–484

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kreyberg L (1969) Actiology of lung cancer: a morphological, epidemiological and experimental analysis. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kvåle G, Bjelke E, Heuch I (1986) Occupational exposure and lung cancer risk. Int J Cancer 37:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  14. McLaughlin JK, Dietz MS, Mehl ES, Blot WJ (1987) Reliability of surrogate information on cigarette smoking by type of informant.Am J Epidemiol 126:144–146

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pastorino U, Berrino F, Gervasio A, Pesenti V, Riboli E (1984) Proportion of lung cancers due to occupational exposure. Int J Cancer 33:231–237

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patussi V, Biava PM, Negro C, Fiorito A, Bovenzi M, Leprini R, Zagaria N, Fischetti F, Bergantin A, Chermaz E, Panegos B, Spadon G, Larese F (1984) Prevalenza della bronchite cronica in due aree urbane a diverso livello di inquinamento atmosferico. Epidemiol Prev 21:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pershagen G, Axelson O (1982) A validation of questionnaire information on occupational exposure and smoking. Scand J Work Environ Health 8:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ronco G, Ciccone G, Mirabelli D, Troia B, Vineis P (1988) Occupation and lung cancer in two industrialized areas of Northern Italy. Int J Cancer 41:354–358

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saracci R (1987) The interactions of tobacco smoking and other agents in cancer etiology. Epidemiol Rev 9:175–193

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simonato L, Saracci R (1983) Cancer, occupational. In: Parmeggiani L (ed) Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety, 3rd revision. International Labour Office, Geneva, pp 369–375

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simonato L, Vineis P, Fletcher AC (1988) Estimates of the proportion of lung cancer attributable to occupational exposure. Carcinogenesis 9:1159–1165

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vena JE, Byers TM, Cookfair D, Swanson M (1985) Occupation and lung cancer risk. An analysis by histologic subtypes. Cancer 56:910–917

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vineis P, Thomas T, Hayes RB, Blot WJ, Mason TJ, Williams Pickle L, Correa P, Fontham ETH, Schoenberg J (1988) Proportion of lung cancers in males, due to occupation, in different areas of the USA. Int J Cancer 42:851–856

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vineis P, Simonato L (1991) Proportion of lung and bladder cancers in males resulting from occupation: a systematic approach. Arch Environ Health 46:6–15

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walter SD (1978) Calculation of attributable risk from epidemiological data. Int J Epidemiol 7:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  26. Williams Pickle L, Morris Brown L, Blot WJ (1983) Information available from surrogate respondents in case-control interview studies. Am J Epidemiol 118:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organisation (1981) Histological typing of lung tumors. Tumori 67:253–272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bovenzi, M., Stanta, G., Antiga, G. et al. Occupational exposure and lung cancer risk in a coastal area of Northeastern Italy. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 65, 35–41 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586056

Key words

Navigation