Abstract
The validity of a diary that estimates exposure to tasks, activities, and postures of the trunk was determined by comparing these self-reported exposure data with observational data of a whole working day. Two populations were studied: 32 professional drivers and five nurses. The nurses and 16 drivers also filled out a shortened version of the diary during another working day. Both versions of the diary showed poor agreement with observations over the same period. However, for variables concerning activities and postures of the trunk agreement was improved by the shortening of the diary. It is concluded that in epidemiologic studies observational measurements of exposure cannot validly be replaced by diaries or similar self-reported exposure data, because the self-reports easily lead to misclassification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlbom A, Axelson O, Støttrup Hansen E, Hogstedt C, Jensen UJ, Olsen J (1990) Interpretation of “negative” studies in occupational epidemiology. Scand J Work Environ Health 16:153–157
Ahlborg GA Jr (1990) Validity of exposure data obtained by questionaire: two examples from occupational reproductive studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 16:284–288
Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, Hagberg M, Johnson B, Kilbom Å, Kuorinka IAA, Silverstein BA, Sjogaard G, ViikariJuntura ERA (1993) A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:73–84
Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R (1992) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Baty D, Buckle PW, Stubbs DA (1986) Posture recording by direct observation, questionaire assessment and instrumentation: a comparison based on a recent field study. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN, Manenica I (eds) The ergonomics of working postures. Proceedings of the 1st International Occupational Ergonomics Symposium, April 1985. Taylor & Francis, London New York Philadelphia, pp 283–292
Borg GAV (1982) A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons. In: Geissler HG, Petzhold P (eds) Psychophysical judgement and the process of perception. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, pp 25–34
Burdorf A (1992) Exposure assessment of risk factors for disorders of the back in occupational epidemiology. Scand J Work Environ Health 18:1–9
Burdorf A, Laan J (1991) Comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load on the back. Scand J Work Environ Health 17:425–429
Colombini D, Occhipinti E, Molteni G, Grieco A, Pedotti A, Boccardi S, Frigo C, Menoni O (1985) Posture analysis. Ergonomics 28:275–284
De Looze MP, Toussaint HM, Ensink J, Mangnus C, Van der Beek AJ (1994) The validity of visual observation to assess posture in a laboratory-simulated material handling task. Ergonomics (in press)
Douwes M, Dul J (1991) Validity and reliability of estimating body angles by direct and indirect observations. In: Quéinnec Y, Daniellou F (eds) Designing for everyone. Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, July 1991. Taylor & Francis, London New York Philadelphia, pp 885–887
Genaidy AM, Simmons RJ, Guo L, Hidalgo JA (1993) Can visual perception be used to estimate body part angles? Ergonomics 36:323–329
Hildebrandt VH, Douwes M (1991) Vragenlijst bewegingsapparaat: de validiteit van gerapporteerde romphoudingen en rugklachten bij vergelijking van beroepsgroepen. DirectorateGeneral of Labour, The Hague (S 122-3)
Kant IJ, Notermans JHV, Borm PJA (1990) Observations of working postures in garages using the Ovako Working Posture Analysing System (OWAS) and consequent workload reduction recommendations. Ergonomics 33:209–220
Kiegeland P (1990) Anforderungen, Beanspruchung and verkehrsrelevante Einstellungen von Berufskraftfährem. Verlag TUV Rheinland, Köln
Kivi P, Matilla M (1991) Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: application of the computerised OWAS method. Appl Ergon 21:43–48
Lammi S, Viikari-Juntura E, Kuosma E, Häkkänen M, Ahonen M, Riihimäki H, Takala E-P, Saarenmaa K (1993) Validation of a questionnaire for estimation of self-reported physical load against observation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 24th Congress of the International Commission of Occupational Health, September 1993. ICOH, Nice, p 151
Maclure M, Willett WC (1987) Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol 126:161–169
Ridd JE, Nicholson AS, Montan AJ (1989) A portable microcomputer bases system for “on site” activity and posture recording. In: Megaw ED (ed) Contemporary ergonomics 1989. Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society Conference, April 1989. Taylor & Francis, London New York Philadelphia, pp 366–371
Rossignol M, Baetz J (1987) Task-related risk factors for spinal injury: validation of a self-administered questionnaire on hospital employees. Ergonomics 30:1531–1540
Rothman KJ (1986) Modern epidemiology. Little, Brown and Company, Boston Toronto
Suen HK, Ary D (1989) Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Van der Beek AJ, Van Gaalen LC, Frings-Dresen MHW (1992) Working postures and activities of lorry drivers: a reliability study of on-site observation and recording on a pocket computer. Appl Ergon 23:331–336
Wiktorin C, Karlqvist L, Winkel J, Stockholm MUSIC I study group (1993) Validity of self-reported exposures to work postures and manual materials handling. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:208–214
Woodcock Webb K (1988) Self-reports in ergonomics: agreement between workers and ergonomist. In: Aghazadeh F (ed) Trends in ergonomics/human factors V. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 387–394
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van der Beek, A.J., Braam, I.T.J., Douwes, M. et al. Validity of a diary estimating exposure to tasks, activities, and postures of the trunk. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 66, 173–178 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380776
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380776