Table 2

Distribution of semen parameters in Taiwanese men

YearParticipantsAge (year)Concentration (106/mL)*Total motility (%)Progressive motility (%)Normal morphology (%)
200150130.8 (4.2)41.9 (2.3)66.4 (13.7)46.9 (15.3)71.8 (13.7)
200261131.1 (4.5)41.8 (2.3)65.5 (12.9)45.7 (15.2)66.5 (16.0)
200355831.5 (4.3)42.5 (2.4)64.8 (14.3)46.4 (15.6)67.3 (16.7)
200453531.1 (4.4)40.6 (2.5)65.3 (14.0)48.4 (15.4)67.9 (15.2)
200551931.5 (3.9)38.3 (2.4)65.6 (14.2)46.5 (15.4)70.7 (13.5)
200653031.3 (4.0)39.1 (2.2)64.8 (13.6)45.7 (15.4)65.7 (13.4)
200751732.0 (3.8)38.6 (2.6)66.8 (12.7)46.5 (15.1)65.8 (13.5)
200855632.3 (4.2)38.6 (2.4)64.8 (14.9)45.9 (15.9)65.8 (14.4)
200943732.5 (4.4)39.3 (2.5)64.5 (14.8)43.9 (14.4)64.0 (14.3)
201044732.7 (4.0)39.8 (2.5)64.2 (14.5)44.4 (15.6)63.7 (14.3)
201142432.8 (4.2)40.3 (2.3)65.8 (15.4)49.1 (18.0)66.3 (14.9)
201240233.0 (4.5)44.3 (2.3)64.2 (16.5)48.1 (17.6)67.8 (16.4)
201332233.2 (4.1)44.1 (2.2)66.1 (16.6)53.4 (19.7)72.1 (13.1)
201411632.7 (4.4)45.9 (2.1)64.1 (19.5)47.1 (17.0)77.0 (12.4)
All647531.9 (4.3)40.6 (2.4)65.3 (14.5)46.8 (16.1)67.4 (14.9)
p for trend – –0.270.37<0.0010.95
  • Results are presented as the mean (SD) for the age and semen parameters.

  • *Sperm concentration was log-transformed to achieve normality for data analysis and then geometric mean (SD) were transformed back for presentation.