Table 3

Work practices from the pre–postprogramme surveys

Baseline adjusted mean (±SE)Follow-up adjusted mean (±SE)Adjusted mean difference (95% CI)*
Study hospital (A)
 Safe Patient Handling (1–5)2.24 (±0.04)2.59 (±0.05)0.35 (0.27 to 0.43)
 Unsafe patient handling (1–5)2.15 (±0.03)2.04 (±0.03)−0.11 (−0.18 to −0.04)
 Patient repositioning (lifts/shift)12.13 (±0.36)11.04 (±0.38)−1.08 (−1.81 to −0.35)
 Work-unit SPH norms3.38 (±0.03)3.39 (±0.03)0.01 (−0.05 to 0.06)
 Self-efficacy to use SPH devices3.51 (±0.05)3.43 (±0.05)−0.09 (−0.19 to 0.01)
 Safety practices3.55 (±0.03)3.59 (±0.03)0.04 (−0.02 to 0.11)
 Ergonomics practices3.04 (±0.04)3.11 (±0.04)0.08 (0.00 to 0.15)
Comparison hospital (B)
 Safe Patient Handling2.43 (±0.03)2.44 (±0.03)0.00 (−0.05 to 0.06)
 Unsafe patient handling2.17 (±0.02)2.19 (±0.02)0.01 (−0.03 to 0.06)
 Patient repositioning (lifts/shift)12.66 (±0.29)12.57 (±0.29)−0.09 (−0.58 to 0.40)
 Work-unit SPH norms3.37 (±0.02)3.37 (±0.02)−0.00 (−0.04 to 0.04)
 Self-efficacy to use SPH devices3.66 (±0.04)3.58 (±0.04)−0.08 (−0.15 to −0.02)
 Safety practices3.90 (±0.02)3.82 (±0.02)−0.08 (−0.13 to −0.03)
 Ergonomics practices3.17 (±0.03)3.14 (±0.03)−0.03 (−0.08 to 0.02)
  • Mixed-model ANCOVA analysis was performed controlling for employee ID.

  • *Italicised values indicate significant (p<0.05) differences between preprogramme and postprogramme.

  • ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; SPH, safe patient handling.