Table 2

Methodological quality appraisal of the studies

Study referencesMethodological itemsScore (%)Adjusted analysisQuality
1233A3B456788A910111212A13141515A
Prospective/retrospective cohort studies
 Tüchsen et al35++*+NANA++++++*+67YesHigh
 Tüchsen et al36++++*NANA+++++?+67YesHigh
 Angersbach et al37++NANA+++++NA50NoLow
Case-control studies
 Kleiven et al38++++++NANA+++++++76YesHigh
 Bourbonnais et al39++++NANA++++++59YesHigh
Cross-sectional studies
 Higashi et al40+++++NANA++NA+67YesHigh
 Niedhammer et al41++++NANA++++62YesHigh
 Böckerman and Laukkanen42+++*NANA+++*+54YesHigh
 Ohayon et al43++++NANA+++54YesHigh
 Eyal et al44++?+NANA++++54YesHigh
 Chan et al45+++NANA+++++NA+75NoLow
 Koller46+++++NANA++NA+67NoLow
 Smith et al47++++NANA+NANA+55NoLow
 Colligan et al48++++NANA++NA50NoLow
 Drake et al49+++NANA++NA+50NoLow
 Chee and Rampal50++*+*++*NANA+46NoLow
 Lambert et al51++NANA++++46NoLow
 Olsen and Dahl52++NANA++++46NoLow
 Jamal and Baba53+++NANA++NA42NoLow
 Sveinsdottir54+++NANA+NA+42NoLow
 Demerouti et al55+++*NANA++38NoLow
 Aguirre and Foret56++?+NANA+NA+42NoLow
 Drago and Wooden57++NANA+++38NoLow
 Fawer and Lob58+NANANANA+18NoLow
  • * Item changed from ‘?’ after information was retrieved from the authors.

  • Item changed from ‘?’ after a copy of the questionnaire was found on the internet.

  • Not able to establish contact with the corresponding author.