Table 1

Results of meta-regression analysis of occurrence (%) of work absence in back pain populations (follow-up 6 months or longer)

 Number of studiesPooled estimate (95% CI)Meta-regression
p ValueExplained variance (%)
All studies17*15.5 (9.8 to 23.6)
Setting0.10921.5
 Insurance database211.8 (3.3 to 34.0)
 Population420.8 (12.1 to 33.6)
 Healthcare77.9 (2.7 to 20.7)
 Workplace435.0 (18.4 to 56.1)
Geographical area0.5390.0
 North America1414.4 (9.6 to 21.1)
 Europe
 Other321.6 (2.6 to 73.9)
Study period†0.8880.0
 1977–1990214.6 (11.3 to 18.7)
 1991–2000610.7 (5.5 to 20.0)
 2001–2007714.0 (7.2 to 25.4)
Assessment0.2034.5
 Electronic record525.2 (11.1 to 47.7)
 Self-reported1212.4 (6.8 to 21.5)
Participation bias0.2781.1
 Low risk of bias710.7 (4.1 to 25.3)
 Moderate risk of bias1019.5 (11.2 to 31.8)
 High risk of bias
  • *Vingard et al26 reported data separately for men and women. Similarly, Murtezani et al43 reported data separately for white and blue collar jobs. Each data point is entered into the meta-analysis as a separate study.

  • †Two studies did not report study period.