Table 4 Association of health sector with the risk of total injuries and MSIs by nursing occupations
OccupationSector Of occupationInjury rate per 100 FTEAdjusted RR for all-injuries (95 CIs)Adjusted RR for MSIs (95 CIs)
RNsAcute care73.221.91.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)
Community care19.77.70.38 (0.33 to 0.43)0.41 (0.31 to 0.55)
p<0.0001p<0.0001
Nursing homes7.117.20.87 (0.62 to 1.21)1.30 (0.80 to 2.10)
0.4046p0.2897
LPNsAcute care74.530.51.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)
Community CareNo dataNo dataNo dataNo data
Nursing homes24.626.80.81 (0.73 to 0.90)0.81 (0.77 to 0.86)
p<0.0001p<0.0001
CAsAcute care31.030.71.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)
Community Care26.825.30.80 (0.66 to 0.96)0.96 (0.87 to 1.06)
p0.0202p0.3925
Nursing homes42.237.01.22 (0.92 to 1.63)1.42 (1.09 to 1.85)
p0.1686p0.0086
  • CA represents care-aides, nursing assistants, community health workers.

  • Ref., reference.

  • RRs, 95 CIs and p values were derived from Poisson regression model with generalised estimating equations.

  • Adjusted variables: gender and age; health region were treated as cluster variables in the model.

  • LPNs were under-utilised in community care. There were very few LPNs requested for community care-posted positions. The combined productive hours in three health regions produced the equivalent of 9 person-years. This indicates that in community care for LPNs there was only enough time-at-risk hours equivalent to a total of nine people across three health regions working full-time for 1 year. The data are insufficient to make any calculations of relative risk.40