Table 4

Comparison of fatal accident rates in international commercial fishing

Study rankCountry*Study periodDeaths from accidents at workPopulation at riskFatal accident rate (per 100000 fishermen-years)§
*References are 17–19 for studies ranked 1–3; 6 for study 4; 9 for study 5; 20, 21 for studies 6 and 7; 8 is the present study; 22–26 for studies 9–13; and 24 for study 14.
†Populations at risk are estimated from the number of fatal accidents and mortality rates cited.
‡Fatal accidents include drowning of uncertain circumstances and disappearances at sea.
§Comparison of fatal accident rates across the different studies can be affected by variation in the study inclusion criteria; for example, according to factors such as whether accidents in port are included, whether disappearances at sea and unexplained drowning are included as accidents, and whether part time fishermen are included in the population at risk.
1Alaska1980–8827867052415
2New Zealand1975–847930385†260
3UK – Grimsby196362460244
4UK1958–6719798100201
5UK1961–80711420710†169
6Denmark1988–924430555144
7Australia1982–844732867†143
8UK1976–95527‡440355120
9Alaska1991–98162139200116
10Iceland1966–8613214764989
11Poland – Baltic sea1975–84334811369
12USA1982–876481378723†47
13Canada – Atlantic coast1975–838418337846
14Poland – deep sea1975–84116404417