Study (ref)10-150 | Asbestos RR (95% CI) in non-smokers | Test of additivity U | Test of multiplicativity V (95% CI) | Deviance | Fitted effects (multiplicative model) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | S | AS | |||||||||
de Klerk et al 13 | 1.90 (0.62 to 5.85)10-151 | 4.90 | 1.25 (0.19 to 8.08) | 0.05 | 2.68 | 4.00 | 10.75 | ||||
Martischniget al 14 | 1.08 (0.38 to 3.06) | 3.71 | 2.89 (0.87 to 9.62) | 3.08 | 2.40 | 2.21 | 5.29 | ||||
Rubino et al 15 | Undefined | 1.32 | Undefined | 0.00 | 2.32 | ∞ | ∞ | ||||
Pastorino et al 16 | 2.52 (0.79 to 9.10)10-152 | ||||||||||
No PAHs | 2.57 | 0.64 (0.10 to 4.06) | 0.21 | 1.88 | 5.03 | 9.46 | |||||
PAHs | 7.36 | 1.01 (0.13 to 7.94) | 0.00 | 2.23 | 6.95 | 15.52 | |||||
Bovenziet al 17 | 1.83 (0.64 to 4.95) | 4.92 | 0.86 (0.31 to 2.39) | 0.08 | 1.58 | 9.50 | 15.05 | ||||
Minowa et al 10-153 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||
Kjuus et al 19 | 2.41 (0.89 to 6.55) | 13.04 | 1.52 (0.39 to 5.93) | 0.38 | 3.04 | 5.77 | 17.54 | ||||
Garshicket al 10-154 20 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Age <65 | 1.20 | 5.68 | 6.82 | ||||||||
Age ⩾65 | 0.98 | 9.14 | 8.96 | ||||||||
Blotet al:21-23 | |||||||||||
Georgia | 1.28 (0.61 to 2.69) | 2.60 | 1.26 (0.54 to 2.93) | 0.30 | 1.53 | 4.90 | 7.49 | ||||
Virginia | 1.88 (1.00 to 3.54) | 0.89 | 0.84 (0.39 to 1.81) | 0.21 | 1.67 | 2.93 | 4.89 | ||||
Florida | 1.80 (0.59 to 5.48) | 0.98 | 0.72 (0.22 to 2.36) | 0.28 | 1.35 | 5.63 | 7.58 |
↵10-150 First author of most papers on study; reference is to paper from which main results were obtained.
↵10-151 Relative risk and 95% CI from matched analysis as given by authors.
↵10-152 Adjusted for exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
↵10-153 Summary statistics cannot be estimated for this study.
↵10-154 The authors did not present data separated by smoking and asbestos exposure, only results of logistic regression, from which fitted effects are shown. Smoking effects are for >50 pack-years.