Table 4

Association between low back complaints and exposure to pushing and pulling over 50 kg

Trouble (ache, pain, discomfort)High pain intensityHigh disability
Crude and adjusted prevalence rate ratios for pushing and pulling (and 95% CI) are presented. Prevalence rate ratios were estimated in three separate regression models for each of the three dimensions of complaints. Adjusted prevalence rate ratios were estimated using multivariate models (all included confounding factors and corresponding adjusted prevalence rate ratios are presented in the corresponding column). Gender and age were a priori forced into the models.
Crude prevalence rate ratios
Reference group1.001.001.00
Medium exposed group1.04 (0.80 to 1.37)0.98 (0.61 to 1.60)0.96 (0.43 to 2.11)
High exposed group1.02 (0.76 to 1.37)1.35 (0.83 to 2.18)2.15 (1.05 to 4.41)
Adjusted prevalence rate ratios
Reference group1.001.001.00
Medium exposed group1.05 (0.78 to 1.41)0.99 (0.59 to 1.66)0.83 (0.33 to 2.07)
High exposed group1.42 (0.96 to 2.10)2.15 (1.08 to 4.27)2.25 (0.71 to 7.10)
Confounding factors
Gender
    Men1.001.001.00
    Women1.45 (1.07 to 1.96)1.73 (1.03 to 2.90)1.31 (0.58 to 2.99)
Age1.00 (0.99 to 1.01)1.01 (0.99 to 1.03)1.01 (0.97 to 1.04)
Driving
    Reference group1.001.001.00
    Medium exposed0.81 (0.56 to 1.17)0.68 (0.35 to 1.34)0.64 (0.21 to 1.98)
    High exposed0.94 (0.61 to 1.45)1.07 (0.51 to 2.27)0.90 (0.26 to 3.14)
Decision authority
    High1.00
    Low1.40 (0.69 to 2.85)
Skill discretion
    High1.00
    Low1.01 (0.52 to 1.96)
Psychosocial work demands
    Low1.00
    High2.54 (1.23 to 5.26)
Supervisor support
    High1.00
    Low1.70 (0.86 to 3.33)