Table 2

Summary of epidemiological studies on chlorinated disinfection byproducts and adverse reproductive outcomes

Author (year) Study details (location, time, sample size) Cases Exposure assessment Other risk factors included Main positive findings OR (95% CI)
Kramer et al 48(1992)Iowa, US
151 Towns with a single water source
1989–90
Sample population: 4028
588 (Total)
159 Low birth weight
342 Preterm delivery
187 Intrauterine growth retardation, small for gestational age
Based on maternal residential address and one municipal water survey to estimate individual THM concentrations (2 or 3 exposure categories)Maternal age
Parity
Marital status
Education
Smoking
Prenatal care
Chloroform, No vmedium (1–9 μg/l) v high (⩾10 μg/l):
Low birth weight
Chloroform, 1 v 1.1 (0.7–1.6)v 1.3 (0.8–2.2)
Intrauterine growth retardation
Chloroform, 1 v 1.3 (0.9–1.8)v 1.8 (1.1–2.9)
Intrauterine growth retardation
Dichlorobromomethane, 1 v 1.2
(0.8–1.7)v 1.7 (0.9–2.9)
Aschengrau et al 45 (1993)Massachusetts, USA
2 Hospitals
1977–80
Sample population: 2348
1171 (total)
1039 Major congenital malformations
Urinary tract defects
Respiratory tract defects
77 Stillbirths
55 Neonatal deaths
Based on maternal residential address to ascertain type of water supply, chlorination v chloramination, and ground or mixed water v surface water.Maternal age
Pregnancy history
Alcohol
Ethnicity
Hospital payment
Other water contaminants
Chlorinated vchloraminated:
Stillbirth
2.6 (0.9 to 7.5)
Neonatal deaths
1.1 (95% CI not provided)
Congenital malformations
Major malformations 1.5 (0.7 to 2.1)
Respiratory defects 3.2 (1.1 to 9.5)
Urinary tract defects 4.1 (1.2 to 14.1)
Bove et al 49 (1995)New Jersey, USA
75 Towns with a public water supply
1985–88
Sample population: 81602
29268 (Total)
Live births:
1853 Low birth weight
905 Very low birth weight
4082 Small for gestational age
7167 Preterm
594 Foetal deaths
All births: defects:
669 Surveillance
118 Central nervous system defects
83 Oral cleft
56 Neural tube
108 Major cardiac
Based on maternal residential address and municipal water surveys to estimate monthly TTHM concentrations (5 or 6 exposure categories)Maternal age
Ethnicity
Sex of baby
Primipara
Prenatal care
Education
Previous still or miscarriage
Other contaminants
TTHM concentrations >100 μg/l v ⩽20 μg/l:
Low birth weight
1.4 (50% CI 1.2 to 1.7)
Intrauterine growth retardation or small for gestational age
1.5 (90% CI 1.2 to 1.9)
TTHM concentrations >80 μg/l v ⩽20 μg/l:
Surveillance Register defects
1.6 (90% CI 1.2 to 2.0)
CNS system defects
2.6 (90% CI 1.5 to 4.3)
Neural tube defects
3.0 (90% CI 1.3 to 6.6)
Major cardiac defects
1.8 (90% CI 1.0 to 3.3)
TTHM concentrations >100 μg/l v ⩽20 μg/l:
Oral cleft defects
3.2 (90% CI 1.2 to 7.3)
Savitz et al 52 (1995)Carolina, USA
6 Hospitals
1988–91
Sample population: 1003
548 (Total)
126 Spontaneous abortion
244 Preterm
178 Low birth weight
Based on maternal residential address and quarterly municipal water surveys to estimate average TTHM concentrations. Analysis of: (a) Surface vground water source, (b) TTHM concentrations, (3 exposure categories) (c) Consumption during pregnancy (d) Water source × amount (e) TTHM dose (concentration × amount)Maternal age
Ethnicity
Hospital
Education
Marital status
Poverty level
Smoking
Alcohol consumption
Employment
Nausea
40.8–59.9 v81.1–168.8 μg/l TTHM:
Spontaneous abortion
1.2 (0.6 to 2.4)
40.8–63.3 v 82.8–168.8 μg/l TTHM:
Low birth weight
1.3 (0.8 to 2.1)
Per 50 μg/l TTHM increment change:
Spontaneous abortion
1.7 (1.1 to 2.7)
Kanitz et al 46(1996)Liguria, Italy
2 Hospitals
1988–1989
Sample population: 676
548 Live births in exposed area
50 Preterm
141 Caesarean section
133 Neonatal jaundice
20 Low birth weight
288 Small body length
370 Small cranial circumference
Based on maternal residential address to ascertain type of water source (chlorine dioxide or hypochloritev not treated)Maternal age
Education
Smoking
Alcohol
Sex of child
Sodium hypochlorite treated (8–16 μg/l TTHMs) v non treated water:
Neonatal jaundice
1.1 (0.7 to 2.8)
Low birth weight
6.0 (0.6 to 12.6)
Small body length
2.3 (1.3 to 4.2)
Small cranial circumference
3.5 (2.1 to 8.5)
Waller et al 53 (1998)California, USA
3 Regions of surface, ground, and mixed drinking water
1989–1991
Sample population: 5144 pregnancies
499 Spontaneous abortionsBased on maternal residential address and quarterly municipal water surveys to estimate average TTHM and individual THM concentrations. Analysis based on: (a) THM concentrations (3 or 10 exposure categories) (b) consumption during first trimester from interview (2 exposure categories)Maternal age
Gestational age
Smoking
History of pregnancy loss
Ethnicity
Employment
High TTHM dose (⩾5 glasses/day + ⩾75 μg/l) v low dose (<5 glasses/day + <75 μg/l):
Spontaneous abortion
1.8 (1.1 to 3.0).
High BDCM dose (⩾5 glasses/day + ⩾18 μg/l) v low dose (<5 glasses/day + <18 μg/l):
Spontaneous abortion
3.0 (1.4 to 6.6)
Gallagher et al 50 (1998)Colorado, USA
28 Census blocks in 2 water districts
1990–1993
Sample population: 1244 live births
72 Low birth weight
29 Term low birth weight
68 Preterm delivery
Based on maternal residential address and municipal water surveys. Estimate of household TTHM concentration during last trimester based on hydraulic modelling (4 exposure categories)Maternal age
Smoking
Marital status
Parity
Education
Employment
Prenatal care
High TTHM concentration (⩾ 61 μg/l) v lowest (⩽20 μg/l):
Low birth weight
2.1 (1.0 to 4.8)
Term low birth weight
5.9 (2.0 to 17.0)
Dodds et al 51 (1999)Nova Scotia, Canada
1988–95
Sample population: 49842 births
4673 Small for gestational age
2393 Low birth weight
342 Very low birth weight
2689 Preterm delivery
77 Neural tube
82 Cleft defect
430 Major cardiac defects
197 Stillbirth
96 Chromosomal abnormalities
Based on maternal residential address and TTHM concentrations for public water facilities (3 sampling locations) modelled with linear regression on the basis of observations by year, month, and facility (4 exposure categories)Maternal age
Parity
Maternal smoking
Attendance prenatal classes
Neighbourhood family income
Sex
Pregnancy and predelivery weight
0–49 μg/l v >100 μg/l TTHMs
Still birth
1.66 (1.09 to 2.52)
Chromosomal abnormalities
1.38 (0.73 to 2.59)
Small for gestation age
1.08 (0.99 to 1.18)
Neural tube defects
1.18 (0.67 to 2.10)
Klotz and Pyrch56 (1999)New Jersey, US
1993–4
Sample population: All births, of which 112 cases and 248 controls were selected
112 Neural tube defectsBased on residential address and public water facility TTHM data, and tap water sampling for TTHMs, HANs, and HAAs (3–5 exposure categories)Sociodemographics
Pregnancy and medical history
Parental occupational
Use of vitamins
TTHMs public monitoring data, Known residence and isolated cases <5 μg/l v>40 μg/l
Neural tube defects
2.1 (1.1 to 4.0)
Magnuset al 47 (1999)Norway
Sample population: 141077
2608 All birth defects
62 Neural tube defects
250 Major cardiac defects
91 Respiratory defects
122 Urinary defects
143 Oral cleft
Chlorination yesv no
Colour highv low
(in chlorinated water average TTHMs = 9.4 μg/l, average HAAs = 14.6 μg/l)
Maternal age
Parity
Geographical placement
Population density
Industry profile
No chlorination low colour v chlorination high colour
All birth defects
1.14 (0.99 to 1.31)
Urinary tract defects
1.99 (1.10 to 3.57)
Neural tube defects
1.26 (0.61 to 2.62)
Major cardiac defects
1.05 (0.76 to 1.46)
Respiratory tract defects
1.07 (0.52 to 2.19)