TY - JOUR T1 - 0323  Workplace Psychosocial Risk Factors for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Pooled Prospective Study0323  Workplace Psychosocial Risk Factors for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Pooled Prospective Study JF - Occupational and Environmental Medicine JO - Occup Environ Med SP - A40 LP - A40 DO - 10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.124 VL - 71 IS - Suppl 1 AU - Carisa Harris Adamson AU - Ellen Eisen AU - Kurt Hegman AU - Matthew Thiese AU - Barbara Silverstein AU - Stephen Bao AU - Arun Garg AU - Jay Kapellusch AU - Susan Burt AU - Fred Gerr AU - Linda Merlino AU - Ann Marie Dale AU - Bradley Evanoff AU - David Rempel Y1 - 2014/06/01 UR - http://oem.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_1/A40.2.abstract N2 - Objectives Seven research groups conducted coordinated studies of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In this analysis of the pooled cohort, we estimate associations of workplace psychosocial factors and CTS incidence with adjustment for biomechanical factors. Method 3515 workers were followed up to 7 years. Case criteria included symptoms consistent with CTS and an abnormal electrodiagnostic study. Psychosocial exposure was measured using the Job Content Questionnaire to assess risk among those with high job strain measures. Individual level occupational biomechanical exposures included the%time spent >30° wrist extension, % time in >30° wrist flexion, total repetition rate, and the%time spent in forceful exertion (>1kg-pinch; >4kg-grip). A sub-cohort of 1091 participants had both psychosocial and biomechanical exposure data. Adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results After adjustment for gender, age and BMI in the sub-cohort, high job strain (HR=1.40; 95% CI:0.86–2.28) and high psychological demand (HR=1.25; 95% CI:0.79–1.98) showed statistically non-significant elevation in risk of CTS, and high decision latitude (HR=0.70; 95% CI:0.44–1.13) showed non-significant decrease in risk. When the same models were adjusted for biomechanical exposures, confounding was not evident; the primary exposure effect estimates changed between 1–7% for high job strain (HR=1.30; 95% CI:0.81–2.17), high psychological demand (HR=1.17; 95% CI:0.74–1.83), and high decision latitude (HR=0.71; 95% CI:0.43–1.18). Conclusions For this sub-cohort analysis, adjustment for biomechanical exposures did not alter the associations between workplace psychosocial factors and incident CTS. The findings suggest that workplace psychosocial risk is independent of workplace biomechanical risk. ER -