Physiological deactivation after two contrasting tasks at a video display terminal: learning vs repetitive data entry

Ergonomics. 1993 Jun;36(6):601-11. doi: 10.1080/00140139308967923.

Abstract

Two contrasting 90 min VDT work situations were simulated in the laboratory: (1) a machine-paced, repetitive data entry task; and (2) a stimulating, self-paced learning task with successive feedback. Thirty non-smoking male students (20-34 years), without previous experience of VDT work, participated individually in each condition on two consecutive days (balanced order) and in a task-free baseline condition. Self-reports and successive measurements (ambulatory recordings) of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were obtained during work and during a subsequent 60 min period of deactivation. Urine samples were obtained after each period for the determination of catecholamines and cortisol. In the baseline condition, measurements were obtained at corresponding times of the day. As expected, the data entry task was associated with self-reports of boredom, irritation, and unpleasantness; the learning task wtih alertness, interest, and ability to concentrate. Similar elevations of physiological measurements occurred in both work situations. However, differences between conditions were found after work. Following data entry, deactivation was slower in five of the six variables (significant for epinephrine).

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Arousal*
  • Attention*
  • Blood Pressure
  • Boredom
  • Computer Terminals*
  • Heart Rate
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Problem Solving