Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case–control study of cancers of the brain—INTERPHONE-Study

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of the study is to validate self-reported cellular phone use information by comparing it with the cumulative emitted power and duration of calls measured by software-modified cellular phones (SMP). The information was obtained using a questionnaire developed for the international case–control study on the risk of the use of mobile phones in tumours of the brain or salivary gland (INTERPHONE-study). Method: The study was conducted in Bielefeld, Germany. Volunteers were asked to use SMPs instead of their own cellular phones for a period of 1 month. The SMP recorded the power emitted by the mobile phone handset during each base station contact. Information on cellular phone use for the same time period from traffic records of the network providers and from face-to-face interviews with the participants 3 months after the SMP use was assessed. Pearson's correlation coefficients and linear regression models were used to analyse the association between information from the interview and from the SMP. Results: In total, 1757 personal mobile phone calls were recorded for 45 persons by SMP and traffic records. The correlation between the self-reported information about the number and the duration of calls with the cumulative power of calls was 0.50 (P<0.01) and 0.48 (P<0.01), respectively. Almost 23% of the variance of the cumulative power was explained by either the number or the cumulative duration of calls. After inclusion of possible confounding factors in the regression model, the variance increased to 26%. Minor confounding factors were “network provider”, “contract form”, and “cellular phone model”. Discussion: The number of calls alone is a sufficient parameter to estimate the cumulative power emitted by the handset of a cellular telephone. The cumulative power emitted by these phones is only associated with number of calls but not with possible confounding factors. Using the mobile phone while driving, mainly in cities, or mainly in rural areas is not associated with the recorded cumulative power in the SMP.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernhardt J.H. Gesundheitliche Aspekte des Mobilfunks. Dtsch Ärzteblatt 1999: 96: C592–C597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice J.D., and McLaughlin J.K. Epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones and cancer risk — a review. SSI Rapport 2002: 16.

  • Cardis E., and Kilkenny M. International case-control study of adult brain, head and neck tumours: results of the feasibility study. Radiat Prot Dosim 1999: 83: 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein A.R., and Cicchetti D.V. High agreement but low Kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epdemiol 1990: 46: 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funch D.P., Rothman K.J., Loughlin J.E., and Dreyer N.A. Utility of telephone company records for epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones [see comments]. Epidemiology 1996: 7: 299–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muscat J.E., Malkin M.G., and Shore R.E., et al. Handheld cellular telephones and risk of acoustic neuroma. Neurology 2002: 58: 1304–1306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parslow R.C., Hepworth S.J., and McKinney P.A. Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. Radiat Prot Dosim 2003: 106: 233–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samkange-Zeeb F., Berg G., and Blettner M. Validation of self-reported cellular phone use. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004: 14: 245–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart W., and the independent Expert group on mobile phones National Radiological Protection board. Mobile phones and health. Chilton Didcot Oxon 2000, pp. 33–38.

  • Wiart J., Dale C., Bosisio A.V., and Cornec A.L. Analysis of the influence of the power control and discontinuous transmission on RF exposure with GSM mobile phones. IEEE Transact. Electromagn Comp 2000: 42 (43): 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press: New York, 1998, pp. 101–147.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the two network operators, Vodafone and T mobile for the technical assistance during data acquisition. We also thank the international Interphone team at the IARC for the support in data processing and for the continual advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Berg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, G., Schüz, J., Samkange-Zeeb, F. et al. Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case–control study of cancers of the brain—INTERPHONE-Study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 15, 217–224 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500390

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500390

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links