Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of a Graded Activity Intervention for Low Back Pain in Occupational Health on Sick Leave, Functional Status and Pain: 12-Month Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Behaviorally oriented graded activity interventions have been suggested for sick-listed workers with low back pain on return to work, but have not been extensively evaluated. Methods: One hundred and thirty-four workers were randomly assigned to either a graded activity intervention (n = 67) or usual care (n = 67) and followed-up for 12 months. Results: The graded activity group returned back to work faster with a median of 54 days compared to 67 days in the usual care group. The graded activity intervention was more effective after approximately 50 days post-randomization (HRR = 1.9, CI = 1.2–3.1, p = 0.01). Differences between the groups in number of recurrent episodes, total number of days of sick leave due to low back pain, and total number of days of sick leave due to all diagnoses, were in favor of the graded activity group, although not statistically significant. No effects of the graded activity intervention were found for functional status or pain. Conclusion: Graded activity intervention is a valuable strategy to enhance short-term return to work outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA 1992; 268: 760–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Mutanen P, Rissanen P, Pahkajarvi H, Levon H, Karpoff H, Roine R. Mini-intervention for subacute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2003; 28: 533–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elders LA, van der Beek AJ, Burdorf A. Return to work after sickness absence due to back disorders—A systematic review on intervention strategies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2000; 73: 339–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Staal JB, Hlobil H, van Tulder MW, Waddell G, Burton AK, Koes BW, van Mechelen W. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: An international comparison. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: 618–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Noe C, Gardea M, Pulliam C, Thompson J. Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: A one-year prospective study. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson LE, Fordyce WE, Nachemson AL. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: A randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 279–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Staal JB, Hlobil H, Twisk JW, Smid T, Koke AJ, van Mechelen W. Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 77–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shephard RJ. PAR-Q. Canadian Home Fitness Test and exercise screening alternatives. Sports Med 1988; 5: 185–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faas A, Chavannes AW, Koes BW, van den Hoogen JMN, Mens JMA, Smeele LJM, Romeijnders ACM, van der Laan JR. NHG-Standaard Lage-Rugpijn (The Dutch College of General Practitioners guidelines for LBP; in Dutch). Huisarts en Wetenschap 1996; 39: 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roland MO. The natural history of back pain. Practitioner 1983; 227: 1119–1122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983; 16: 87–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine 2000; 25: 1973–1976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 1995; 20: 473–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, Lemaire J. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 1997; 22: 2911–2918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem van Mechelen MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hlobil, H., Staal, J.B., Twisk, J. et al. The Effects of a Graded Activity Intervention for Low Back Pain in Occupational Health on Sick Leave, Functional Status and Pain: 12-Month Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Occup Rehabil 15, 569–580 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8035-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8035-y

Key Words

Navigation