Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Letter
Response to: ‘Pleural mesothelioma and occupational and non-occupational asbestos exposure: a case-control study with quantitative risk assessment’ by Ferrante et al
  1. Gary M Marsh1,2,
  2. Stacey M Benson2
  1. 1Center for Occupational Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2Cardno ChemRisk, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gary M Marsh, Cardno ChemRisk, 20 Stanwix St. Pittsburgh, PA 15222, USA; gary.marsh{at}cardno.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

We read with interest the 2016 paper by Ferrante et al,1 who evaluated the relationship between occupational and non-occupational asbestos exposures and the risk of pleural malignant mesothelioma (PMM) among workers and residents in the Casale Monferrato area of Italy, the site of a former asbestos cement factory. We also read the subsequent letter from Boffetta,2 who identified many problematic methodological issues with the Ferrante et al1 study, most notably: limited detail regarding exposure estimation methods, lack of reproducibility, inconsistencies in findings and potential study biases. In a response, Ferrante et al3 challenged but did not resolve all issues raised by Boffetta.2 For example, Ferrante et al3 countered Boffetta's2 criticism about limited exposure estimation detail by citing a paper not referenced in their original publication.1 Furthermore, …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles