Article Text

Original article
Intervention to reduce heat stress and improve efficiency among sugarcane workers in El Salvador: Phase 1
  1. T Bodin1,
  2. R García-Trabanino2,
  3. I Weiss3,
  4. E Jarquín4,
  5. J Glaser3,
  6. K Jakobsson5,
  7. R A I Lucas6,
  8. C Wesseling1,
  9. C Hogstedt1,
  10. D H Wegman7
  11. the WE Program Working Group
    1. 1Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    2. 2Association of Nephrology and Hypertension of El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador
    3. 3La Isla Foundation, Ada, Michigan, USA
    4. 4Agency for Development and Agricultural Health (AGDYSA), San Salvador, El Salvador
    5. 5Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
    6. 6School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
    7. 7Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
    1. Correspondence to Dr David H Wegman, Emeritus Professor University of Massachusetts Lowell, 7 Camden Place, Cambridge 02138, MA, USA; david_wegman{at}uml.edu

    Abstract

    Background Chronic heat stress and dehydration from strenuous work in hot environments is considered an essential component of the epidemic of chronic kidney disease in Central America.

    Objective (1) To assess feasibility of providing an intervention modelled on OSHA's Water.Rest.Shade programme (WRS) during sugarcane cutting and (2) to prevent heat stress and dehydration without decreasing productivity.

    Methods Midway through the 6-month harvest, the intervention introduced WRS practices. A 60-person cutting group was provided water supplied in individual backpacks, mobile shaded rest areas and scheduled rest periods. Ergonomically improved machetes and efficiency strategies were also implemented. Health data (anthropometric, blood, urine, questionnaires) were collected preharvest, preintervention, mid-intervention and at the end of harvest. A subsample participated in focus group discussions. Daily wet bulb globe temperatures (WBGT) were recorded. The employer provided individual production records.

    Results Over the harvest WBGT was >26°C from 9:00 onwards reaching average maximum of 29.3±1.7°C, around 13:00. Postintervention self-reported water consumption increased 25%. Symptoms associated with heat stress and with dehydration decreased. Individual daily production increased from 5.1 to a high of 7.3 tons/person/day postintervention. This increase was greater than in other cutting groups at the company. Focus groups reported a positive perception of components of the WRS, and the new machete and cutting programmes.

    Conclusions A WRS intervention is feasible in sugarcane fields, and appears to markedly reduce the impact of the heat stress conditions for the workforce. With proper attention to work practices, production can be maintained with less impact on worker health.

    • Heat Stress
    • Intervention
    • Chronic kidney disease
    • Dehydration
    • Mesoamerican nephropathy

    This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Supplementary materials

    • Abstract in Spanish

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Linked Articles