Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Understanding changes over time in workers' compensation claim rates using time series analytical techniques
  1. Ian C Moore1,
  2. Emile Tompa1,2,3
  1. 1Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Emile Tompa, Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E9, Canada; etompa{at}iwh.on.ca

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to better understand the inter-temporal variation in workers' compensation claim rates using time series analytical techniques not commonly used in the occupational health and safety literature. We focus specifically on the role of unemployment rates in explaining claim rate variations.

Methods The major components of workers' compensation claim rates are decomposed using data from a Canadian workers' compensation authority for the period 1991–2007. Several techniques are used to undertake the decomposition and assess key factors driving rates: (i) the multitaper spectral estimator, (ii) the harmonic F test, (iii) the Kalman smoother and (iv) ordinary least squares.

Results The largest component of the periodic behaviour in workers' compensation claim rates is seasonal variation. Business cycle fluctuations in workers' compensation claim rates move inversely to unemployment rates.

Conclusions The analysis suggests that workers' compensation claim rates between 1991 and 2008 were driven by (in order of magnitude) a strong negative long term growth trend, periodic seasonal trends and business cycle fluctuations proxied by the Ontario unemployment rate.

  • Statistics
  • injuries
  • worker's compensation
  • occupational health practice
  • mathematical models
  • time series study

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding The WSIB Research Advisory Council provided funding for this study. Grant # 09025.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.