Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Parental occupational exposure to potential endocrine disrupting chemicals and risk of hypospadias in infants
  1. Natasha Nassar1,*,
  2. Prashan Abeywardana1,
  3. Andrew Barker2,
  4. Carol Bower1
  1. 1 Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Australia;
  2. 2 Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Australia
  1. Correspondence to: Natasha Nassar, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, 100 Roberts Road, Subiaco, 6008, Australia; natashan{at}ichr.uwa.edu.au

Abstract

Objectives: Hypospadias is a urogenital birth defect affecting infant boys. Periconceptual parental occupational exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with oestrogenic or anti-androgenic properties may adversely affect male genital development in-utero. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between both maternal and paternal occupational exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and hypospadias.

Methods: This registry-based case-control study considered all 1202 cases of hypospadias born in Western Australia between 1980 and 2000 and a cohort of 2583 male controls randomly selected from birth records for whom information regarding parental occupation was available from the Western Australian Maternal and Child Health Research Database. Occupational exposures to seven groups of potential EDCs were independently coded by two researchers according to a validated job-exposure matrix.

Results: Multivariable analysis showed a strong association with potential maternal occupational exposure to heavy metals with an over two-fold increased risk of hypospadias (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.6, 95%CI 1.3 to 5.2) and women exposed to phthalates were more likely to have an affected son (1.2, 0.8 to 1.7). Compared with mild or isolated cases, the risk of moderate-severe hypospadias or multiple defects were increased up to 2 and 5-fold, respectively with maternal exposure to most types of EDC. Paternal occupational exposure to polychlorinated organic (OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0 to 1.8) and bi-phenolic (OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.0 to 2.6) compounds were also possible risk factors.

Conclusions: Findings provide preliminary evidence regarding exposure to chemicals with oestrogenic or anti-androgenic properties of EDCs and increased risk of hypospadias. Further studies taking into account more detailed parental occupational exposure and possibly, assessment of the effect of genetic susceptibility, are required to elucidate the underlying aetiology of hypospadias.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.