rss
Occup Environ Med doi:10.1136/oem.2009.048470
  • Original article

Do pre-employment influences explain the association between psychosocial factors at work and coronary heart disease? The Whitehall II study.

  1. Taina Hintsa1,*,
  2. Martin Shipley2,
  3. David Gimeno3,
  4. Marko Elovainio4,
  5. Tarani Chandola2,
  6. Markus Jokela5,
  7. Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen5,
  8. Jussi Vahtera6,
  9. Michael G Marmot2,
  10. Mika Kivimäki2
  1. 1 University of Helsinki, Finland;
  2. 2 University College London, United Kingdom;
  3. 3 The University of Texas Health Science Center, United States;
  4. 4 National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland;
  5. 5 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, United Kingdom;
  6. 6 University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  1. Correspondence to: Taina Hintsa, Department of Psychology, /University of Helsinki, /PO Box 9, /Helsinki, /FIN-00014, Finland; taina.hintsa{at}helsinki.fi
  • Received 20 May 2009
  • Accepted 16 September 2009
  • Published Online First 9 October 2009

Abstract

Objectives: To examine whether the association between psychosocial factors at work and incident coronary heart disease (CHD) is explained by pre-employment factors, such as family history of CHD, education, paternal education and social class, number of siblings, and height.

Methods: A prospective cohort study of 6435 British men aged 35-55 years at phase 1 (1985-1988) and free from prevalent CHD at phase 2 (1989-1990). Psychosocial factors at work were assessed at phases 1 and 2 and mean scores across the two phases were used to determine long-term exposure. Selected pre-employment factors were assessed at phase 1. Follow-up for coronary death, first non-fatal myocardial infarction or definite angina between phase 2 and 1999 was based on clinical records (250 events, follow-up 8.7 years).

Results: The selected pre-employment factors were associated with risk for CHD: hazard ratios (CI 95%) were 1.33 (1.03-1.73) for family history of CHD, 1.18 (1.05-1.32) for each quartile decrease in height, and 1.16 (0.99-1.35) for each category increase in number of siblings. Psychosocial work factors also predicted CHD: 1.72 (1.08-2.74) for low job control and 1.72 (1.10-2.67) for low organisational justice. Adjustment for pre-employment factors changed these associations by 4.1% or less.

Conclusions: In this well-characterised occupational cohort of British men, the association between psychosocial factors at work and CHD was largely independent of family history of CHD, education, paternal educational attainment and social class, number of siblings, and height.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. All Versions of this Article:
      1. oem.2009.048470v1
      2. 67/5/330 most recent

    Services

    1. Request permissions

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Social bookmarking

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.