Article Text

other Versions

PDF
A cross sectional study on lung function and respiratory symptoms among chemical workers producing diacetyl for food flavourings
  1. Frits G B G J van Rooy (f.vanrooy{at}uu.nl)
  1. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Netherlands
    1. Lidwien A M Smit
    1. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Netherlands
      1. Remko Houba
      1. Netherlands Expertise Centre for Occupational Respiratory Disorders, Netherlands
        1. Vanessa A C Zaat
        1. Netherlands Expertise Centre for Occupational Respiratory Disorders, Netherlands
          1. Jos M Rooyackers
          1. Netherlands Expertise Centre for Occupational Respiratory Disorders, Netherlands
            1. Dick J J Heederik
            1. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Netherlands

              Abstract

              Objectives: Four diacetyl workers were found to have bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate exposures, respiratory symptoms, lung function and exposure-response relationships.

              Methods: The study was conducted among 175 of a cohort of 196 workers from a plant which produced diacetyl between 1960 and 2003. All available historical exposure data were used to model diacetyl exposure. Lung function and questionnaire data on respiratory symptoms were compared to a general population sample and respiratory symptoms to an internal reference group.

              Results: Workers were potentially exposed to acetoin, diacetyl, acetaldehyde, and acetic acid. Historic diacetyl exposure in the working environments ranged from 1.8 to 351 mg/m3 and for specific tasks from 3 to 396 mg/m3. Diacetyl workers reported significantly more respiratory symptoms compared to the general population sample (continuous trouble with breathing prevalence ratio (PR=2.6; 95% CI 1.3-5.1); daily cough (PR=1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.1); asthma attack (ever) (PR=2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.4); doctor diagnosed asthma (PR=2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.8); asthma attack in the last year (PR=4.7; 95% CI 1.9-11.4)). Lung function did not differ between the groups. A positive relationship between exposure and FEV1 was found. Operators reported significantly more respiratory symptoms compared to a minimally exposed internal reference group (ever trouble with breathing prevalence ratio (PR=2.8; 95% CI 1.1-7.0); work-related shortness of breath in the last year (PR=7.5; 95% CI 1.1-52.9)).

              Conclusion: The excess of respiratory symptoms in this retrospective cohort supports the occupational hazard in diacetyl production demonstrated earlier in the case cluster. A job title-related excess of symptoms existed in operators with the highest exposures compared to an internal reference population. Limited historical exposure data did not support a quantitative individual diacetyl exposure-response relation, but our findings suggest that preventive measures are prudent.

              Statistics from Altmetric.com

              Request permissions

              If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.