rss
Occup Environ Med doi:10.1136/oem.2006.031427

Comparisons of self-reported and register data on sickness absence among public employees in Sweden

  1. Margaretha Voss (margaretha.voss{at}ki.se)
  1. Karolinska Institutet, Dept. of Clinical Neuroscience, Sweden
    1. Stefan Stark (stefan.stark{at}itf.se)
    1. Uppsala University, Sweden
      1. Lars Alfredsson (lars.alfredsson{at}ki.se)
      1. Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
        1. Eva Vingard (eva.vingard{at}medsci.uu.se)
        1. Uppsala University, Sweden
          1. Malin Josephson (malin.josephson{at}medsci.uu.se)
          1. Uppsala University, Sweden
            • Published Online First 17 August 2007

            Abstract

            Aim: Self-reported assessments of sickness absence are often performed in epidemiologic studies. The objective of this study was to compare the number of sick-leave days according to self-reported data over 12 months with data from employer’s register for the same period. An additional aim was to ascertain whether the self-reported information and the recorded data would show equivalent associations with self-reported general health. Methods: The study was based on a cohort of 4869 municipal employees in Sweden, about 80% women, who answered a questionnaire in 2001-2002. The responses provided by the employees included information on number of sick-leave days and self-rated health. Data on sick-leave days, occupation and age were derived from the employers’ computerized registers. The questionnaire information on sick-leave days was compared with the corresponding information retrieved from the employer register by means of calculating sensitivity and specificity, using the employers data as "gold standard&rdquo". Results: The annual number of sick-leave days was lower according to the self-reported information than to the register data. For women the agreement between the two sickness absence measures for no sick-leave days, 1-7 days and ≥28 days were 74%, 72% and 67%, respectively. The sensitivity of questionnaire versus register information regarding any self-reported sick-leave day was 91% and the specificity was 74%. Sensitivity and specificity for sickness absence ≥28 days were 67% and 98%, respectively. The results for men were similar as to those for women. Self-reported and recorded sickness absence were both associated with self-rated health. The odds ratios were 7.27 and 8.25, for subjects with ≥28 recorded and self-reported number of sick-leave days respectively, compared to subjects with no sickness absence. Conclusions: Good agreement was found between self-reported and register information on sickness absence. Self-reported data on sickness absence may be useful in common epidemiological applications.

            This Article

            1. All Versions of this Article:
              1. oem.2006.031427v1
              2. 65/1/61 most recent

            Services

            1. Request permissions

            Responses

            1. Submit a response
            2. No responses published

            Social bookmarking

            Register for free content


            Free sample
            This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
            View free sample issue >>

            Free archive
            The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
            Register to access the free archive >>

            Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.