rss
Occup Environ Med doi:10.1136/oem.2006.031005

Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure-response

  1. Misty J Hein (zcr9{at}cdc.gov)
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
    1. Leslie Stayner (lstayner{at}uic.edu)
    1. NIOSH, United States
      1. Everett Lehman (elehman{at}cdc.gov)
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
        1. John M Dement (demen001{at}mc.duke.edu)
        1. Duke University Medical Center, United States
          • Published Online First 20 April 2007

          Abstract

          Objectives This report provides an update of the mortality experience of a cohort of South Carolina asbestos textile workers. Methods A cohort of 3,072 workers exposed to chrysotile in a South Carolina asbestos textile plant (1916-1977) was followed up for mortality through 2001. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed using U.S. and South Carolina mortality rates. A job exposure matrix provided calendar time dependent estimates of chrysotile exposure concentrations. Poisson regression models were fitted for lung cancer and asbestosis. Covariates considered included sex, race, age, calendar time, birth cohort, and time since first exposure. Cumulative exposure lags of 5 and 10 years were considered by disregarding exposure in the most recent 5 and 10 years, respectively. Results A majority of the cohort was deceased (64%) and 702 of the 1,961 deaths occurred since the previous update. Mortality was elevated based on U.S. referent rates for a priori causes of interest including all causes combined (SMR 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.39); all cancers (SMR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.39); esophageal cancer (SMR 1.87, 95% CI 1.09-2.99); lung cancer (SMR 1.95, 95% CI 1.68-2.24); ischemic heart disease (SMR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.32); and pneumoconiosis and other respiratory diseases (SMR 4.81, 95% CI 3.84-5.94). Mortality remained elevated for these causes when South Carolina referent rates were used. Three cases of mesothelioma were observed among cohort members. Exposure-response modeling for lung cancer, using a linear relative risk model, produced a slope coefficient of 0.0198 (fiber-years/ml)-1 (standard error 0.00496), when cumulative exposure was lagged 10 years. Poisson regression modeling confirmed significant positive relationships between estimated chrysotile exposure and lung cancer and asbestosis mortality observed in previous updates of this cohort. Conclusions This study confirms the findings from previous investigations of excess mortality from lung cancer and asbestosis and a strong exposure-response relationship between estimated exposure to chrysotile and mortality from lung cancer and asbestosis.

          Register for free content


          Free sample
          This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
          View free sample issue >>

          Free archive
          The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
          Register to access the free archive >>

          Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.